...
首页> 外文期刊>Mutation Research: International Journal on Mutagenesis, Chromosome Breakage and Related Subjects >Comparison of supervised clustering methods to discriminate genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling.
【24h】

Comparison of supervised clustering methods to discriminate genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling.

机译:有监督的聚类方法通过基因表达谱分析区分遗传毒性和非遗传毒性致癌物的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prediction of the toxic properties of chemicals based on modulation of gene expression profiles in exposed cells or animals is one of the major applications of toxicogenomics. Previously, we demonstrated that by Pearson correlation analysis of gene expression profiles from treated HepG2 cells it is possible to correctly discriminate and predict genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens. Since to date many different supervised clustering methods for discrimination and prediction tests are available, we investigated whether application of the methods provided by the Whitehead Institute and Stanford University improved our initial prediction. Four different supervised clustering methods were applied for this comparison, namely Pearson correlation analysis (Pearson), nearest shrunken centroids analysis (NSC), K-nearest neighbour analysis (KNN) and Weighted voting (WV). For each supervised clustering method, three different approaches were followed: (1) using all the data points for all treatments, (2) exclusion of the samples with marginally affected gene expression profiles and (3) filtering out the gene expression signals that were hardly altered. On the complete data set, NSC, KNN and WV outperformed the Pearson test, but on the reduced data sets no clear difference was observed. Exclusion of samples with marginally affected profiles improved the prediction by all methods. For the various prediction models, gene sets of different compositions were selected; in these 27 genes appeared three times or more. These 27 genes are involved in many different biological processes and molecular functions, such as apoptosis, cell cycle control, regulation of transcription, and transporter activity, many of them related to the carcinogenic process. One gene, BAX, was selected in all 10 models, while ZFP36 was selected in 9, and AHR, MT1E and TTR in 8. Summarising, this study demonstrates that several supervised clustering methods can be used to discriminate certain genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling in vitro in HepG2 cells. None of the methods clearly outperforms the others.
机译:基于暴露细胞或动物中基因表达谱的调节来预测化学药品的毒性是毒理基因组学的主要应用之一。以前,我们证明了通过对处理过的HepG2细胞的基因表达谱进行Pearson相关分析,可以正确地区分和预测来自非遗传毒性致癌物的遗传毒性。由于迄今为止可以使用许多不同的监督聚类方法进行判别和预测测试,因此我们调查了怀特海德研究所和斯坦福大学提供的方法是否能改善我们的初步预测。比较中使用了四种不同的监督聚类方法,分别是Pearson相关分析(Pearson),最近收缩质心分析(NSC),K最近邻分析(KNN)和加权投票(WV)。对于每种监督聚类方法,遵循三种不同的方法:(1)使用所有处理的所有数据点;(2)排除基因表达谱受到轻微影响的样品;(3)滤除几乎不存在的基因表达信号改变了。在完整的数据集上,NSC,KNN和WV优于Pearson检验,但是在简化的数据集上,没有观察到明显的差异。通过所有方法排除具有略微影响的轮廓的样本可以改善预测。对于各种预测模型,选择了不同组成的基因集。在这27个基因中,出现了3次以上。这27个基因涉及许多不同的生物学过程和分子功能,例如凋亡,细胞周期控制,转录调节和转运蛋白活性,其中许多与致癌过程有关。在所有10个模型中均选择了一个基因BAX,在9个模型中选择了ZFP36,在8个模型中选择了AHR,MT1E和TTR。总之,这项研究表明,可以使用几种监督聚类方法来区分某些遗传毒性和非遗传毒性致癌物。通过体外HepG2细胞中的基因表达谱分析。没有一种方法明显优于其他方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号