...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology >Comparison of transthoracic and intraoperative transesophageal color flow Doppler assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation.
【24h】

Comparison of transthoracic and intraoperative transesophageal color flow Doppler assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation.

机译:经胸和术中经食道彩色血流多普勒评估二尖瓣和主动脉瓣关闭不全的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: We examined the agreement between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and intraoperative prepump transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the assessment of left-sided regurgitant lesions and echocardiographic variables associated with grading discrepancies. METHODS: The TTE and prepump TEE studies of 54 patients undergoing aortic-valve replacement for aortic stenosis were reviewed. Agreement and correlation in assessment of aortic (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between mean TTE and prepump TEE grading of MR (0.23 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.21 +/- 0.15 jet area/area of the left atrium, p = 0.49), but the correlation between the two methods was weak (r = 0.40, p = 0.003), with an exact agreement of 54%. Prepump TEE tended to grade AR as more severe (mean grade 1.43 +/- 0.94 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.75, p = 0.058). The correlation between the two methods in AR assessment was fair (r = 0.70, p = 0.0001) with an agreement of 59%. For MR and AR grading, no significant correlations between valvular regurgitation severity and blood pressure differences between preoperative TTE and prepump TEE were found. In 17% of cases, discrepancies in identifying severe mitral or aortic valve regurgitation could have affected patient management. CONCLUSIONS: There is modest agreement in MR and AR assessment between TTE and prepump TEE. Cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and anesthesiologists must be aware of differences between these methods when using prepump TEE to guide intraoperative decisions.
机译:背景:我们检查了经胸超声心动图(TTE)与术前泵浦食道超声心动图(TEE)之间的一致性,以评估左侧反流性病变和与分级差异相关的超声心动图变量。方法:回顾了54例行主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的患者的TTE和泵前TEE研究。评估主动脉(AR)和二尖瓣反流(MR)严重程度的一致性和相关性。结果:MR的平均TTE和泵前TEE分级之间无显着差异(0.23 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.21 +/- 0.15左心房射血面积/面积,p = 0.49),但是两种方法之间的相关性较弱(r = 0.40,p = 0.003),精确一致性为54%。泵前TEE倾向于将AR等级定为更严重(平均等级1.43 +/- 0.94对1.24 +/- 0.75,p = 0.058)。两种方法在AR评估中的相关性是公平的(r = 0.70,p = 0.0001),一致性为59%。对于MR和AR分级,未发现瓣膜反流严重程度与术前TTE和泵前TEE之间的血压差异之间存在显着相关性。在17%的病例中,识别出严重的二尖瓣或主动脉瓣关闭不全的差异可能会影响患者的治疗。结论:TTE和预泵TEE在MR和AR评估中没有达成一致。心脏科医生,心脏外科医生和麻醉师在使用前置泵TEE指导术中决策时,必须意识到这些方法之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号