...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology >The fear of unseen predators: ground squirrel tail flagging in the absence of snakes signals vigilance
【24h】

The fear of unseen predators: ground squirrel tail flagging in the absence of snakes signals vigilance

机译:害怕看不见的掠食者:没有蛇时地面松鼠的尾巴标志着警惕

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Rather than fleeing from predators, many animals exhibit conspicuous displays that are thought to deter attacks by advertising quality (physical capabilities), or awareness of the predator. However, prey commonly exhibit the same antipredator display when predators are absent. Signaling in this context could either dishonestly indicate predator detection, or honestly indicate vigilance, but no study has tested these hypotheses experimentally. We tested the vigilance advertisement function of tail flagging, a signal given by California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi) to rattlesnakes (Crotalus oreganus), by simulating snake strikes and quantifying strike avoidance behaviors in signaling and non-signaling squirrels. We removed the effect of snake presence on signaling by simulating strikes 1) in the presence of a rattlesnake, 2) with no snake present, or 3) in an area where squirrels had recently encountered a snake that was no longer present. Squirrels tail flagged most when interacting with a snake. Squirrels also signaled in areas of recent snake encounters, and in this context, they responded faster to simulated strikes and were more likely to leap vertically or horizontally away from the attack. Tail flagging rate was also related to squirrels' body displacement time and flee modality. Squirrels rarely signaled or exhibited evasive leaping with no snake present. These results indicate that displays in the absence of predators can honestly signal vigilance, or the readiness to avoid an attack, even if predators are undetected. Such antipredator displays may be widespread as many species could benefit from advertising alertness when uncertain of the location of predators.
机译:许多动物没有逃避掠食者,而是表现出明显的展示,它们被认为可以通过广告质量(体力)或对掠夺者的意识来阻止攻击。但是,当没有掠食者时,猎物通常会显示相同的反掠食者显示。在这种情况下发出的信号可能要么不诚实地表明掠食者被发现,要么诚实地表明了警惕,但尚无研究通过实验检验这些假设。我们通过模拟蛇的袭击并量化信号性和非信号性松鼠中的回避行为,测试了尾旗的警觉广告功能,该信号是由加州地松鼠(Otospermophilus beecheyi)向响尾蛇(Crotalus oreganus)发出的信号。我们通过模拟罢工1)响尾蛇的存在,2)没有蛇的存在或3)在松鼠最近遇到不再存在的蛇的区域中消除了蛇的存在对信号的影响。与蛇互动时,松鼠的尾巴标记最多。松鼠还在最近遇到的蛇的区域发出信号,在这种情况下,它们对模拟打击的反应更快,并且更有可能在垂直或水平方向跳离攻击。尾标率也与松鼠的身体移位时间和逃跑方式有关。在没有蛇的情况下,松鼠很少发出信号或表现出逃避跳跃。这些结果表明,即使没有发现掠食者,在没有掠食者的情况下进行的展示也可以诚实地发出警惕或准备避免袭击。由于不确定捕食者的位置,许多物种可能会从广告警觉中受益,因此这种反捕食者的展示可能会很普遍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号