首页> 外文期刊>Muscle and Nerve >Hand-held nerve conduction device in carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective study
【24h】

Hand-held nerve conduction device in carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective study

机译:腕管综合征中的手持式神经传导装置:一项前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: We assessed the clinical impact of replacing standard neurophysiologic testing with a hand-held device (Mediracer) for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: One hundred patients (200 hands) with suspected CTS were studied by blinded assessors [Hand-therapist (HT)1 and Consultant Neurophysiologist] using the Mediracer, followed by standard neurophysiologic testing. To simulate testing by personnel without neurological training, Mediracer recordings were analyzed separately by an assessor who had not seen the patients (HT2). Results: Correlation of the CTS grades was 0.94 for the results obtained by HT1, and 0.87 for HT2. The sensitivity and specificity of the Mediracer was 0.85 and 0.9, respectively, by HT1, and 0.84 and 0.89 for HT2. Nine patients had conditions other than CTS, and 35 patients were judged to require further investigation. Conclusions: The Mediracer should only be used in patients with typical CTS symptoms and signs and no muscle wasting who have had careful neurological assessment.
机译:简介:我们评估了用手持设备(Mediracer)替代标准神经生理学检查对腕管综合症(CTS)的诊断的临床影响。方法:由百叶窗评估者[手治疗师(HT)1和神经生理学顾问]对100名疑似CTS患者(200手)进行了研究,并使用Mediracer进行了标准的神经生理学测试。为了模拟未经神经系统训练的人员进行的测试,Mediracer记录由未曾见过患者(HT2)的评估人员单独进行分析。结果:HT1获得的结果与CTS等级的相关性为0.94,HT2获得的相关性为0.87。 HT1对Mediracer的敏感性和特异性分别为0.85和0.9,而HT2对Mediracer的敏感性和特异性分别为0.84和0.89。 9名患者有CTS以外的疾病,并判断35名患者需要进一步检查。结论:Mediracer仅适用于具有典型CTS症状和体征且没有肌肉消瘦且经过仔细神经系统评估的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号