...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology >Competition and group size in Thomas's langurs (Presbytis thomasi): the folivore paradox revisited
【24h】

Competition and group size in Thomas's langurs (Presbytis thomasi): the folivore paradox revisited

机译:托马斯叶猴(Presbytis thomasi)中的竞争和群体规模:重新审视叶面悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Among primates, group size is highly variable. The standard ecological model assumes that better predation avoidance as group size increases favours living in larger groups, whereas increased travel costs and reduced net food intake due to within-group competition for resources set the upper Limit. Folivorous primates, however, tend to defy this generalisation in that some live in small groups despite low costs of feeding competition. To resolve this 'folivore paradox', it has been suggested that folivore group size is limited by social factors such as male harassment or infanticide, or that females can disperse more easily and thus maintain group size near optimum levels. In this paper, we examine the effects of group size on home range size, day-journey length, activity budget and diet in wild Thomas's langurs (Presbytis thomasi), which live in one-male multi-female groups with a limited Life cycle. We examined only data from the stable middle tenure phase when factors such as the strength of the breeding male or the way in which groups were formed did not influence ranging and activities. During this phase, group size affected day-journey length and home range size, and had a minor effect on diet, but did not influence time spent feeding or resting, allogrooming or birth rates. Hence the upper limit to group size during the middle tenure phase in Thomas's langurs is not set by feeding competition. The folivore paradox is not due to frequent female dispersal in Thomas's lan,ours. The timing of female dispersal is not as expected if it serves to keep group sizes near the ecological optimum, and groups seem to be below this optimum. Instead, female reproductive success is presumably maximised in small to mid-sized groups because larger groups shaw a clear trend to experience higher risk of take-over, often accompanied by infanticide. Because females can redistribute themselves among nearby groups when groups reorganise each time a new male starts up a new group, females can keep the group small. Thus, a social factor, risk of infanticide, seems to provide the selective advantage to small group size in Thomas's langurs.
机译:在灵长类动物中,群体大小是高度可变的。标准的生态模型假设,随着群体规模的扩大,更好地避免捕食会有利于大群体的生活,而由于群体内部对资源的竞争而增加的旅行成本和减少的食物净摄入量则设置了上限。然而,食肉类的灵长类动物不顾这种普遍化,因为尽管饲养竞争的成本很低,但有些人仍生活在小群中。为了解决这种“叶状悖论”,有人建议将叶状种群的规模限制于社会因素,例如男性骚扰或杀婴行为,或者女性可以更容易分散,从而将种群规模保持在最佳水平。在本文中,我们研究了群体大小对野生托马斯叶猴(Presbytis thomasi)的家庭范围大小,日行程长度,活动预算和饮食的影响,这些叶猴生活在一个单生命周期的多雌性群体中。当繁殖雄性的强度或组形成方式等因素不影响范围和活动时,我们仅研究了来自稳定中年期的数据。在此阶段中,组的大小影响日间旅行的长度和家庭范围的大小,对饮食影响不大,但不影响进食或休息时间,配种或出生率。因此,托马斯叶猴中年期阶段的群体规模上限不是由进食竞争设定的。叶状悖论不是由于我们的托马斯地区女性频繁散布。如果女性散布的时机能够使群体规模保持在生态最优水平附近,并且群体似乎低于该最优水平,那么女性散布的时间就不会像预期的那样。取而代之的是,在中小型人群中,女性的生殖成功被认为是最大化的,因为较大的人群显示出明显的趋势,即更高的接管风险,通常伴随着杀婴。因为每当新的男性启动一个新的小组时,当小组重新组织时,雌性便可以在附近的小组中重新分配自己,因此雌性可以使小组保持较小的规模。因此,社会因素,即杀婴的危险,似乎为托马斯叶猴中的小规模群体提供了选择优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号