...
首页> 外文期刊>Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis >IWGT report on quantitative approaches to genotoxicity risk assessment I. Methods and metrics for defining exposure-response relationships and points of departure (PoDs)
【24h】

IWGT report on quantitative approaches to genotoxicity risk assessment I. Methods and metrics for defining exposure-response relationships and points of departure (PoDs)

机译:IWGT关于遗传毒性风险评估的定量方法的报告I.定义暴露-反应关系和出发点(PoD)的方法和指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This report summarizes the discussion, conclusions, and points of consensus of the IWGT Working Group on Quantitative Approaches to Genetic Toxicology Risk Assessment (QWG) based on a meeting in Foz do Iguacu, Brazil October 31 November 2, 2013. Topics addressed included (1) the need for quantitative dose response analysis, (2) methods to analyze exposure response relationships & derive point of departure (PoD) metrics, (3) points of departure (PoD) and mechanistic threshold considerations, (4) approaches to define exposure-related risks, (5) empirical relationships between genetic damage (mutation) and cancer, and (6) extrapolations across test systems and species. This report discusses the first three of these topics and a companion report discusses the latter three. The working group critically examined methods for determining point of-departure metrics (PoDs) that could be used to estimate low-dose risk of genetic damage and from which extrapolation to acceptable exposure levels could be made using appropriate mode of action information and uncertainty factors. These included benchmark doses (BMDs) derived from fitting families of exponential models, the No Observed Genotoxic Effect Level (NOGEL), and "threshold" or breakpoint dose (BPD) levels derived from bilinear models when mechanistic data supported this approach. The QWG recognizes that scientific evidence suggests that thresholds below which genotoxic effects do not occur likely exist for both DNA-reactive and DNA-nonreactive substances, but notes that small increments of the spontaneous level cannot be unequivocally excluded either by experimental measurement or by mathematical modeling. Therefore, rather than debating the theoretical possibility of such low-dose effects, emphasis should be placed on determination of PoDs from which acceptable exposure levels can be determined by extrapolation using available mechanistic information and appropriate uncertainty factors. This approach places the focus on minimization of the genotoxic risk, which protects against the risk of the development of diseases resulting from the genetic damage. Based on analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each method, the QWG concluded that the order of preference of PoD metrics is the statistical lower bound on the BMD > the NOGEL > a statistical lower bound on the BPD. A companion report discusses the use of these metrics in genotoxicity risk assessment, including scaling and uncertainty factors to be considered when extrapolating below the PoD and/or across test systems and to the human. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:本报告基于2013年10月31日在巴西伊瓜苏市举行的会议,总结了IWGT遗传毒理学风险评估定量方法工作组(QWG)的讨论,结论和共识,包括以下内容:(1 )进行定量剂量反应分析的需要;(2)分析暴露反应关系并得出出发点(PoD)指标的方法;(3)出发点(PoD)和机械阈值注意事项;(4)定义暴露的方法-相关风险;(5)遗传损害(突变)与癌症之间的经验关系;以及(6)跨测试系统和物种的推断。本报告讨论了这些主题的前三个,而伴随报告则讨论了后三个主题。工作组严格审查了确定出发点指标(PoDs)的方法,这些方法可用于估计低剂量的遗传损伤风险,并可以使用适当的作用方式信息和不确定因素从中推断出可接受的暴露水平。其中包括从拟合指数模型系列获得的基准剂量(BMD),无观察到的遗传毒性作用水平(NOGEL),以及在机械数据支持该方法时从双线性模型获得的“阈值”或断点剂量(BPD)水平。 QWG认识到科学证据表明,DNA反应性和DNA非反应性物质都可能存在低于阈值的遗传毒性作用,但请注意,无论是通过实验测量还是通过数学建模,均不能明确排除自发水平的小幅上升。因此,与其讨论这种低剂量效应的理论可能性,不如将其重点放在确定PoD上,可以使用可用的机械信息和适当的不确定性因素通过外推法从中确定可接受的暴露水平。这种方法的重点是使遗传毒性风险最小化,从而防止因遗传损害而导致疾病发展的风险。根据对每种方法的优缺点的分析,QWG得出结论,PoD指标的优先顺序为BMD的统计下限> NOGEL> BPD的统计下限。随附的报告讨论了在遗传毒性风险评估中使用这些指标的情况,包括在PoD以下和/或跨测试系统外推到人类时要考虑的缩放比例和不确定性因素。 (C)2014作者。由Elsevier B.V.发布

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号