首页> 外文期刊>Morbidity and mortality weekly report >Recommendations from an ad hoc Meeting of the WHO Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (LabNet) on use of alternative diagnostic samples for measles and rubella surveillance.
【24h】

Recommendations from an ad hoc Meeting of the WHO Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (LabNet) on use of alternative diagnostic samples for measles and rubella surveillance.

机译:世卫组织麻疹和风疹实验室网络特设会议(LabNet)关于使用替代性诊断样品进行麻疹和风疹监测的建议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Laboratory confirmation of measles and rubella is an important component of disease surveillance in all settings. Because the use of clinical diagnosis for surveillance is unreliable, case-based laboratory confirmation of disease is critically important in settings with measles or rubella elimination goals. The World Health Organization (WHO) Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (LabNet) was established in 2000 to provide a standardized testing and reporting structure and a comprehensive, external quality-assurance program. LabNet currently consists of 679 laboratories serving 166 countries. However, measles and rubella surveillance remains incomplete in certain areas because of difficulties with the collection and transport of serum specimens. Recently, LabNet evaluated two alternative sampling approaches to serum samples, the use of dried blood spots (DBS) and oral fluid (OF) samples. Both of these approaches have potential to be useful tools for measles and rubella control programs. In June 2007, WHO convened an ad hoc meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, to review available data and provide recommendations on use of DBS and OF samples for measles and rubella diagnostics. Attendees included LabNet staff members and scientists who had been conducting studies to evaluate use of these alternative diagnostic samples. The attendees concluded that 1) although serum-based diagnostics remain the "gold standard," the use of these two alternative sampling techniques would not adversely affect routine measles and rubella surveillance and might enhance surveillance; 2) regions in the elimination phase that already have established serum-based testing for rash illness surveillance would not likely benefit from converting to DBS or OF sampling methods, except in special circumstances; and 3) DBS or OF sampling are viable options for measles and rubella surveillance in all regions, especially where patients might resist venipuncture for blood collection, or where special challenges exist with transport or refrigeration of diagnostic samples.
机译:在所有情况下,实验室确认的麻疹和风疹都是疾病监测的重要组成部分。由于将临床诊断用于监视是不可靠的,因此在具有麻疹或风疹消除目标的环境中,基于病例的实验室疾病确认至关重要。世界卫生组织(WHO)麻疹和风疹实验室网络(LabNet)成立于2000年,旨在提供标准化的测试和报告结构以及全面的外部质量保证计划。 LabNet目前包括为166个国家/地区提供服务的679个实验室。但是,由于采集和运输血清标本存在困难,某些地区的麻疹和风疹监测工作仍不完善。最近,LabNet对血清样品的两种替代采样方法进行了评估,即使用干血斑(DBS)和口服液(OF)样品。这两种方法都有可能成为麻疹和风疹控制程序的有用工具。 2007年6月,世卫组织在瑞士日内瓦召开了一次特别会议,以审查现有数据并就使用DBS和OF样本进行麻疹和风疹诊断提供建议。参加者包括LabNet的工作人员和科学家,他们一直在进行研究以评估这些替代诊断样品的使用。与会人员得出的结论是:1)尽管基于血清的诊断仍然是“金标准”,但使用这两种替代采样技术不会对常规的麻疹和风疹监测产生不利影响,并且可能会增强监测; 2)除特殊情况外,在消除阶段已经建立基于血清的皮疹疾病监测测试的地区不太可能受益于转换为DBS或OF采样方法; 3)DBS或OF采样是在所有地区进行麻疹和风疹监测的可行选择,特别是在患者可能抵御静脉穿刺进行采血或诊断或运输诊断样品存在特殊挑战的地方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号