首页> 外文期刊>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution >Hidden diversity in the Andes: Comparison of species delimitation methods in montane marsupials
【24h】

Hidden diversity in the Andes: Comparison of species delimitation methods in montane marsupials

机译:安第斯山脉中的隐藏多样性:山地有袋动物物种界定方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cryptic genetic diversity is a significant challenge for systematists faced with ever-increasing amounts of DNA sequence data. Computationally intensive coalescent-based analyses involving multiple unlinked loci are the only currently viable methods by which to assess the extent to which phenotypically similar populations (or metapopulations) are genetically distinct lineages. Although coalescent-based approaches have been tested extensively via simulations, few empirical studies have examined the impact of prior assumptions and dataset size on the ability to assess genetic isolation (evolutionary independence) using molecular data alone. Here, we consider the efficacy of two coalescent-based approaches (BPP and SpeDeSTEM) for testing the evolutionary independence of cryptic mtDNA haplogroups within three morphologically diagnosable species of Andean mouse opossums (Thylamys pallidior, T. sponsorius, and T. venustus). Fourteen anonymous nuclear loci, one X-linked nuclear intron, and one mitochondrial gene were analyzed for multiple individuals within each haplogroup of interest. We inferred individual gene trees for each locus and considered all of the nuclear loci jointly in a species-tree analysis. Using only the nuclear loci, we performed "species validation" tests for the cryptic mitochondrial lineages in SpeDeSTEM and BPP. For BPP, we also tested a wide range of prior assumptions, assessed performance of the rjMCMC algorithm, and examined how many loci were necessary to confidently delimit lineages. Results from BPP provided strong support for two independent evolutionary lineages each within T. pallidior, T. sponsorius, and T. venustus, whereas SpeDeSTEM results did not support splitting out mtDNA haplogroups as distinct evolutionary units. For most tests, BPP was robust to prior assumptions, although priors were shown to have an effect on both the strength of lineage recognition among T. venustus haplotypes and on the efficiency of the rjMCMC algorithm. Comparisons of results from datasets with different numbers of loci revealed that some cryptic lineages could be confidently delimited with as few as two loci.
机译:对于面对越来越多的DNA序列数据的系统论者来说,隐秘的遗传多样性是一个重大挑战。基于计算密集的基于聚结的分析涉及多个未连接的基因座是目前唯一可行的方法,通过该方法可以评估表型相似的种群(或超群体)在遗传上不同的谱系的程度。尽管基于合并的方法已通过模拟进行了广泛测试,但很少有经验研究检查过先前假设和数据集大小对仅使用分子数据评估遗传隔离(进化独立性)的能力的影响。在这里,我们考虑了两种基于联盟的方法(BPP和SpeDeSTEM)的功效,用于测试安第斯小鼠负鼠(Thylamys pallidior,T。Sponsorius和T. venustus)的三种形态学可诊断物种内的mtDNA隐型单倍体进化独立性。分析了14个匿名核基因座,一个X连锁核内含子和一个线粒体基因,以分析每个感兴趣的单倍组内的多个个体。我们推断出每个基因座的单个基因树,并在物种树分析中共同考虑了所有核基因座。仅使用核基因座,我们对SpeDeSTEM和BPP中的线粒体隐性谱系进行了“物种验证”测试。对于BPP,我们还测试了各种先前的假设,评估了rjMCMC算法的性能,并检查了有多少个位点来自信地界定谱系。 BPP的结果为T. pallidior,T。Sponsorius和T. venustus内的两个独立的进化谱系提供了有力的支持,而SpeDeSTEM的结果不支持将mtDNA单倍群拆分为不同的进化单位。对于大多数测试,BPP对先验假设均具有鲁棒性,尽管已证明先验会影响维氏锥虫单倍型中谱系识别的强度以及rjMCMC算法的效率。来自具有不同基因座数目的数据集的结果比较表明,某些隐秘谱系可以确定地由两个基因座分隔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号