首页> 外文期刊>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution >Phylogeny of Cephalobina (Nematoda): Molecular evidence for recurrent evolution of probolae and incongruence with traditional classifications
【24h】

Phylogeny of Cephalobina (Nematoda): Molecular evidence for recurrent evolution of probolae and incongruence with traditional classifications

机译:头足类(线虫)的系统发育:翼状bol和传统分类的不一致性反复发生的分子证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Nematodes of the suborder Cephalobina include an ecologically and morphologically diverse array of species that range from soil-dwelling microbivores to parasites of vertebrates and invertebrates. Despite a long history of study, certain of these microbivores (Cephaloboidea) present some of the most intractable problems in nematode systematics; the lack of an evolutionary framework for these taxa has prevented the identification of natural groups and inhibited understanding of soil biodiversity and nematode ecology. Phylogenetic analyses of ribosomal (LSU) sequence data from 53 taxa revealed strong support for monophyly of taxa representing the Cephaloboidea, but do not support the monophyly of most genera within this superfamily. Historically these genera have primarily been recognized based on variation in labial morphology, but molecular phylogenies show the same general labial (probolae) morphotype often results from recurrent similarity, a result consistent with the phenotypic plasticity of probolae previously observed for some species in ecological time. Phylogenetic analyses of LSU rDNA also recovered strong support for some other groups of cephalobs, including taxa representing most (but not all) Panagrolaimoidea. In addition to revealing homoplasy of probolae, molecular trees also imply other unexpected patterns of character evolution or polarity, including recurrent similarity of offset spermatheca presence, and representation of complex probolae as the ancestral condition within Cephaloboidea. For Cephalobidae, molecular trees do not support traditional genera as natural groups, but it remains untested if deconstructing probolae morphotypes or other structural features into finer component characters may reveal homologies that help delimit evolutionary lineages. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:头足纲亚目的线虫包括生态和形态学多样的物种,其范围从居住在土壤中的微生物到脊椎动物和无脊椎动物的寄生虫。尽管有悠久的研究历史,但其中某些微生物(Cephaloboidea)还是线虫系统中最棘手的问题。这些类群缺乏进化框架,阻碍了对自然群体的识别,并阻碍了对土壤生物多样性和线虫生态学的理解。从53个分类单元进行的核糖体(LSU)序列数据的系统发育分析表明,强烈支持代表头足类的分类单元的单性,但不支持该超家族中大多数属的单性。从历史上看,这些属主要是根据唇形形态的变化而被识别的,但是分子系统发育显示相同的一般唇形(probolae)形态型通常是由于经常相似而产生的,这一结果与先前在生态时期在某些物种上观察到的probolae的表型可塑性一致。 LSU rDNA的系统发育分析还为其他一些头足类动物,包括代表大部分(但不是全部)Panagrolaimoidea的类群,提供了强有力的支持。除了揭示probolae的同质性外,分子树还暗示了字符进化或极性的其他意想不到的模式,包括复发性相似的精子囊存在的相似性,以及复杂的probolae在头足类动物中的祖先状态。对于头足科,分子树不支持传统属作为自然群体,但是仍未测试过将​​解构形态或其他结构特征解构成更精细的成分可能揭示有助于限定进化谱系的同源性的问题。 (c)2006 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号