首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology >Atrial fibrillation following device closure of patent foramen ovale.
【24h】

Atrial fibrillation following device closure of patent foramen ovale.

机译:卵圆孔未闭装置闭合后的房颤。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent embolic events after device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) have been related to incomplete closure. Another cause could be atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of AF in stroke patients after PFO closure. METHODS: Consecutive patients with device closure of a PFO after a stroke or transient ischemic attack and control patients with stroke underwent 7-day event loop recordings 3 and 6 months after PFO closure or stroke, respectively. RESULTS: Forty patients treated by PFO device closure 96 +/- 68 days after cryptogenic ischemic stroke and 70 control patients with ischemic stroke of other etiologies (known AF excluded) were compared. AF was identified in 6 patients (15%) of the treated group and in 12 control patients (17%, p = 0.77). In multivariate analysis, the presence of an occluder device was not an independent risk factor for AF. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of AF is high after device closure of a PFO in stroke patients and similar to that in patients with stroke of non-PFO etiology and, hence, with no device. Further studies are required to determine the risk of thromboembolism and the optimal treatment in patients developing AF after device closure of a PFO.
机译:目的:卵圆孔未闭(PFO)装置闭合后复发性栓塞事件与闭合不完全有关。另一个原因可能是房颤(AF)。这项研究的目的是确定PFO封堵后卒中患者房颤的发生率。方法:中风或短暂性脑缺血发作后连续关闭PFO装置的患者和中风的对照患者分别在PFO关闭或中风后3和6个月进行7天事件循环记录。结果:比较了40例隐源性缺血性卒中后96 +/- 68天接受PFO装置封闭治疗的患者和70例其他病因(不包括已知房颤)的缺血性卒中对照患者。在治疗组的6名患者(15%)和12名对照患者(17%,p = 0.77)中发现了AF。在多变量分析中,封堵器的存在并不是房颤的独立危险因素。结论:PFO装置关闭后,卒中患者的房颤发生率很高,与非PFO病因的卒中患者相似,因此没有装置。需要进一步的研究以确定在关闭PFO装置后出现AF的患者中血栓栓塞的风险和最佳治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号