首页> 外文期刊>Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte >Biophysical Double-lives, 1939-1946. Or: Spaces of Boredom. On 'Information Discourse' and (Dis)continuities in the Life Sciences [Biophysikalisches Doppelleben, 1939-1946. Oder: R?ume der Lange-weile. Zur (Nicht-)Z?sur des 'Informationsdiskurses']
【24h】

Biophysical Double-lives, 1939-1946. Or: Spaces of Boredom. On 'Information Discourse' and (Dis)continuities in the Life Sciences [Biophysikalisches Doppelleben, 1939-1946. Oder: R?ume der Lange-weile. Zur (Nicht-)Z?sur des 'Informationsdiskurses']

机译:生物物理双寿,1939-1946年。或:无聊的空间。生命科学中的“信息话语”和(Dis)连续性[生物物理现象,1939-1946。或者:无聊的空间。对“信息话语”的(非)z?Sur]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Arguably, few things have shaped the historiography of the mid-twentieth century psy-sciences (and indeed, of the life sciences and science/technology/intellectual life quite generally) more profoundly than the story of cybernetics. This essay aims to undermine this technofuturistic picture of epistemological upheavals, of cyborg regimes of knowing, and of the incipient post-human, by reinserting back into the story the rather dull and unspectacular lives (and occupations) of the great majority of British, 'diverted' biologists during World War II. Instead of Ratio Clubbers or Macy-Conference frequenters, this essay is concerned with a much larger population of would-be biologists and their most pedestrian appropriations of, and exposures to, electronics. What I argue is that the prevalence and systematicity of such exposures in the course of the personnel-hungry radio-war points to a very different - low-key - picture of the war/technology-induced deflections of biological science at mid-century. As an example of how deeply at odds narrations of cybernetic's ascent tend to sit with developments on ground level, special attention will be devoted to the physiologists-turned-radar-scientists Alan Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley, and their war-time, or more properly, spare-time investigations into the biophysics of nerve. The latter - technical, difficult, and utterly unphilosophical - while absent from the cyber-theme-focused historiography, provided the basis for the tremendous impact Hodkgin and Huxley would in fact have on the mainstream, disciplinarily conservative physiological sciences; the larger aim however is to weave these far from peculiar biographical trajectories into a somewhat bigger picture of the intersections between radar electronics and biological science: a picture which does not centre on sensational discourses but on mundane electronic practices; and thus, on the generational experience of those who were known at the time as "ex radar folk with biological leanings".
机译:可以说,几乎没有什么东西比控制论的故事更深刻地影响了20世纪中期心理科学(乃至生命科学和科学/技术/智力生活)的史学。本文的目的是通过将绝大多数英国人平淡无奇的生活(和职业)重新插入故事中,从而破坏这种认识论的动荡,知识分子的半机械人制度和后人类初期的技术未来主义图景。第二次世界大战期间改行的生物学家。这篇文章关注的不是大量的Clubbers会员或Macy-Conference的常客,而是更多的可能的生物学家及其对电子产品的最广泛使用和接触。我要说的是,在人员饥渴的无线电战争过程中,此类暴露的普遍性和系统性表明,本世纪中叶战争/技术引起的生物科学发展大为不同-低调。作为控制论的上升叙事倾向于在地面发展上陷入困境的一个例子,将特别关注由生理学家转变为雷达科学家的艾伦·霍奇金(Alan Hodgkin)和安德鲁·赫x黎(Andrew Huxley),以及他们的战时,或更恰当地说,业余时间研究神经的生物物理学。后者是技术性的,困难的,完全是非哲学的,尽管缺少以网络主题为中心的历史学,却为霍奇金和赫x黎实际上对主流的,学科保守的生理学产生了巨大影响提供了基础。然而,更大的目标是将这些与独特的传记轨迹相距遥远的地方,编织成一幅更大的雷达电子学与生物科学之间交叉点的图景:该图景不以耸人听闻的论述为中心,而是以平凡的电子实践为中心;因此,基于当时被称为“具有生物学倾向的前雷达民”的人们的世代相传经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号