首页> 外文期刊>Molecular ecology resources >DNA Barcodes indicate members of the Anopheles fluviatilis (Diptera: Culicidae) species complex to be conspecific in India
【24h】

DNA Barcodes indicate members of the Anopheles fluviatilis (Diptera: Culicidae) species complex to be conspecific in India

机译:DNA条码表明在印度具有同种性的流感按蚊(双翅目::科)物种复合体的成员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Anopheles fluviatilis, a major vector of malaria in India has been described as a complex of three sibling species members, named as S, T and U, based on variations in chromosomal inversions. Also, ribosomal DNA markers (repetitive Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) and 28S D3 region) were described to differentiate these three sibling species members. However, controversies prevail on the genetic isolation status of these cryptic species. Hence, we evaluated this taxonomic incongruence employing DNA barcoding, the well established methodology for species identification, using 60 An. fluviatilis sensu lato specimens, collected from two malaria endemic eastern states of India. These specimens were also subjected to sibling species characterization by ITS2 and D3 DNA markers. The former marker identified 31 specimens among these as An. fluviatilis S and 21 as An. fluviatilis T. Eight specimens amplified DNA fragments specific for both S and T. The D3 marker characterized 39 specimens belonging to species S and 21 to species T. Neither marker identified species U. Neighbor Joining analysis of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase gene 1 sequences (the DNA barcode) categorized all the 60 specimens into a single operational taxonomic unit, their Kimura 2 parameter (K2P) genetic variability being only 0.8%. The genetic differentiation (F_(ST)) and gene flow (N_m) estimates were 0.00799 and 62.07, respectively, indicating these two 'species' (S & T) as genetically con-specific intermixing populations with negligible genetic differentiation. Earlier investigations have refuted the existence of species U. Also, this study demonstrated that An. fluviatilis and the closely related An. minimus could be taxonomically differentiated by the DNA Barcode approach (K2P = 5.0%).
机译:根据染色体倒位的变化,按蚊是印度疟疾的主要传播媒介,已被描述为三个同胞种成员的复合体,分别命名为S,T和U。此外,描述了核糖体DNA标记(重复的内部转录间隔区2(ITS2)和28S D3区)来区分这三个同胞物种成员。但是,关于这些隐性物种的遗传隔离状态仍存在争议。因此,我们使用60 An评估了使用DNA条形码进行分类的一致性,DNA条形码是用于物种鉴定的成熟方法。从印度东部两个疟疾流行州收集的fluviatilis sensu lato标本。这些标本还通过ITS2和D3 DNA标记进行了兄弟姐妹物种鉴定。前者将其中的31个标本鉴定为An。 fluviatilis S和21 as An。 fluviatilis T.八个标本扩增了对S和T均特异的DNA片段.D3标记对39个属于S物种的标本进行了表征,对21个物种对T物种进行了鉴定。这两个标记均未鉴定出U物种。线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶基因1序列( DNA条码)将所有60个样本分类为一个操作分类单位,它们的Kimura 2参数(K2P)遗传变异性仅为0.8%。遗传分化(F_(ST))和基因流(N_m)估计分别为0.00799和62.07,表明这两个“物种”(S&T)是遗传同种异型混交种群,遗传分化可忽略不计。早期的研究驳斥了物种U的存在。此外,这项研究表明An。 fluviatilis与紧密相关的An。可以通过DNA条码方法(K2P = 5.0%)在分类学上区分小动物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号