...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular ecology >Bi-parental vs. cooperative breeding in a passerine: fitness-maximizing strategies of males in response to risk of extra-pair paternity?
【24h】

Bi-parental vs. cooperative breeding in a passerine: fitness-maximizing strategies of males in response to risk of extra-pair paternity?

机译:雀形目中的双亲繁殖与合作繁殖:雄性最大适应性策略对成对父子的风险的响应?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In socially monogamous species, males that risk cuckoldry more than others might gain inclusive fitness by yielding paternity to relatives. We tested this prediction in the Tibetan ground tit Pseudopodoces humilis, an unusual facultative cooperative breeder wherein most helpers (87% males) join a mated pair shortly before clutch completion. Extra-pair paternity among bi-parental broods occurred less often (26% of broods, 9% of young) compared with cooperative broods (68%, 25%). In the former, most extra-pair sires (88%) were pair breeders unrelated to the cuckolded males, whereas in the latter, sires (87%) were mainly helpers related to the dominant males. Brood productivity did not differ between the bi-parental and cooperative breeders, but helpers' partitioning over group paternity reduced the realized reproductive success of helped males. After taking inclusive fitness into account, however, there was no difference in success of dominant males between the two social systems. One possible explanation for the differences in the rates of cuckoldry in the two systems was body size, because pair-bond males in bi-parental situations were significantly larger than those in cooperative ones. We propose two alternative strategies for males to maximize fitness: breed as a pair if large to avoid cuckoldry from helpers, or breed cooperatively if small but compromise some paternity to relatives. Our results provide an unusual route to the incidence of cooperative groups, based on constraints imposed by low competitive ability of breeding males rather than some external ecological or demographic factors.
机译:在具有社会一夫一妻制的物种中,比其他人更容易遭受戴绿帽子的男性可能会通过向亲戚求亲而获得包容性适应。我们在藏地山雀Pseudopodoces humilis(一种不寻常的兼性合作繁殖者)中测试了这一预测,其中大多数助手(87%的雄性)在离合完成前不久就加入了一对配对。与合作亲戚(68%,25%)相比,双亲亲戚中的成对亲子关系发生率较低(占26%,年轻的9%)。在前者中,大多数成对种公(88%)是与戴绿帽子的雄性无关的成对繁殖者,而在后一种情况中,父系(87%)主要是与显性雄性有关的助手。双亲育种和合作育种之间的亲本生产力没有差异,但是助手对父系亲子的划分减少了被帮助雄性的已实现的繁殖成功率。但是,在考虑到全纳适应性之后,两个社会系统之间的优势男性成功率没有差异。解释这两个系统中戴绿帽的比率差异的一种可能解释是体型,因为双亲情况下的成对成年男性明显大于合作性成年男性。我们为雄性动物提出了两种替代策略,以最大程度地提高其适应性:如果成对繁殖,则成对成对,以避免来自帮手的戴绿帽;如果成年,则合作进行成对繁殖,但会损害亲属的父子关系。我们的结果提供了一个不寻常的途径,导致合作社群体发生,这是由于育种雄性竞争能力低而不是某些外部生态或人口因素所施加的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号