...
首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Classification of vertebral column disorders and lumbar discs disease using attribute weighting algorithm with mean shift clustering
【24h】

Classification of vertebral column disorders and lumbar discs disease using attribute weighting algorithm with mean shift clustering

机译:使用均值漂移聚类的属性加权算法对椎柱疾病和腰椎间盘疾病进行分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this article, a new data pre-processing method has been suggested to detect and classify vertebral column disorders and lumbar disc diseases with a high accuracy level. The suggested pre-processing method is called the Mean Shift Clustering-Based Attribute Weighting (MSCBAW) and is based primarily on mean shift clustering algorithm finding the number of the sets automatically. In this study, we have used two different datasets including lumbar disc diseases (with two classes-our database) and vertebral column disorders datasets (with two or three classes) taken from UCI (University of California at Irvine) machine learning database to test the proposed approach. The MSCBAW method is working as follows: first of all, the centres of the sets automatically for each characteristics in dataset by using the mean shift clustering algorithm are computed. And then, the mean values of each property in dataset are calculated. The weighted datasets by multiplying these mean values by each property value in the dataset that have been obtained by dividing the above mentioned mean values by the centres of the sets belonging to the relevant property are achieved. After the data weighting stage, three different classification algorithms that included the k-NN (k-Nearest Neighbour), RBF-NN (Radial Basis Function-Neural Network) and SVM (Support Vector Machine) classifying algorithms have been used to classify the datasets. In the classification of vertebral column disorders dataset with two classes (normal or abnormal), while the obtained classification accuracies and kappa values were 78.70% +/- 0.455 (the classification accuracy +/- standard deviation), 81.93% +/- 0.899, and 80.32% +/- 0.56 using SVM, k-NN (for k = 1), and RBF-NN classifiers, respectively, the combinations of MSCBAW and SVM, k-NN (for k = 1), and RBF-NN classifiers were obtained 99.03% +/- 0.977, 99.67% +/- 0.992, and 99.35% +/- 0.9852, respectively. In the classification of second dataset named vertebral column disorders dataset with three classes (Normal, Disk Hernia, and Spondylolisthesis), while the obtained classification accuracies and kappa values were 74.51% +/- 0.581, 78.70% +/- 0.659, and 83.22% +/- 0.728 using SVM, k-NN (for k = 1), and RBF-NN classifiers, respectively, the combinations of MSCBAW and SVM, k-NN (for k = 1), and RBF-NN classifiers were obtained 99.35% +/- 0.989, 96.77% +/- 0.948, and 99.67% +/- 0.994, respectively. As for the lumbar disc dataset, while the obtained classification accuracies and kappa values were 94.54% +/- 0.974, 94.54% +/- 0.877, and 93.45% +/- 0.856 using SVM, k-NN (for k = 1), and RBF-NN classifiers, respectively, the combinations of MSCBAW and SVM, k-NN (for k = 1), and RBF-NN classifiers were obtained 100% +/- 1.00, 99.63% +/- 0.991, and 99.63% +/- 0.991, respectively. The best hybrid models in the classification of vertebral column disorders dataset with two classes, vertebral column disorders dataset with three classes, and lumbar disc dataset were the combination of MSCBAW and k-NN classifier, the combination of MSCBAW and RBF-NN classifier, and the combination of MSCBAW and SVM classifier, respectively. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,已经提出了一种新的数据预处理方法,可以以较高的准确度检测和分类椎骨疾病和腰椎间盘疾病。所建议的预处理方法称为基于均值漂移聚类的属性加权(MSCBAW),它主要基于均值漂移聚类算法自动找到集合的数量。在这项研究中,我们使用了两个不同的数据集,包括来自UCI(加州大学尔湾分校)机器学习数据库的腰椎间盘疾病(我们的数据库有两个类别)和脊柱疾病数据集(有两个或三个类别)来测试建议的方法。 MSCBAW方法的工作方式如下:首先,使用均值漂移聚类算法自动计算出数据集中每个特征的集合的中心。然后,计算数据集中每个属性的平均值。通过将这些平均值乘以数据集中的每个属性值来获得加权数据集,该数据集是通过将上述平均值除以属于相关属性的集合的中心而获得的。在数据加权阶段之后,已使用三种不同的分类算法,包括k-NN(最近邻),RBF-NN(径向基函数神经网络)和SVM(支持向量机)分类算法,对数据集进行分类。在两类(正常或异常)脊柱疾病分类数据集的分类中,获得的分类准确度和kappa值分别为78.70%+/- 0.455(分类精度+/-标准偏差),81.93%+/- 0.899,分别使用SVM,k-NN(对于k = 1)和RBF-NN分类器以及MSCBAW和SVM,k-NN(对于k = 1)和RBF-NN分类器分别为80.32%+/- 0.56分别获得99.03%+/- 0.977、99.67%+/- 0.992和99.35%+/- 0.9852。在第二类数据集的分类中,分为三类(正常,磁盘疝和脊椎滑脱),而获得的分类准确度和kappa值分别为74.51%+/- 0.581、78.70%+/- 0.659和83.22%分别使用SVM,k-NN(对于k = 1)和RBF-NN分类器进行+/- 0.728,获得MSCBAW和SVM,k-NN(对于k = 1)和RBF-NN分类器的组合99.35 %+/- 0.989、96.77 +/- 0.948和99.67%+/- 0.994。对于腰间盘数据集,使用SVM,k-NN(对于k = 1)获得的分类准确度和kappa值分别为94.54%+/- 0.974、94.54%+/- 0.877和93.45%+/- 0.856,和RBF-NN分类器,分别获得MSCBAW和SVM,k-NN(对于k = 1)和RBF-NN分类器的组合100%+/- 1.00、99.63%+/- 0.991和99.63%+分别为0.991。在MSCBAW和k-NN分类器的组合,MSCBAW和RBF-NN分类器的组合,两类椎柱疾病数据集,三类脊柱疾病数据集和腰椎盘数据分类中,最佳混合模型是分别是MSCBAW和SVM分类器的组合。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号