首页> 外文期刊>Canadian pharmacists journal: CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC >Ontario pharmacists' crisis over Bill 16: A missed opportunity?
【24h】

Ontario pharmacists' crisis over Bill 16: A missed opportunity?

机译:安大略省药剂师对Bill 16的危机:错失良机?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: In 2010, the Ontario government brought forward Bill 16, which, among other things, removed pharmacists' professional allowances. While many would disagree with this unilateral action by the Ontario government, it also could have served as a crisis for change towards patient-centred care. We sought to examine the response of the pharmacy profession in Ontario to this crisis as it relates to the vision outlined in the Blueprint for Pharmacy.Methods: We systematically examined publicly available responses to Schedule 5 of Ontario's Bill 16 during the period from April to June 16,2010. A rapid textual analysis of the data using tag or word clouds and a qualitative content analysis were performed on all of the data collected. Results: The rapid textual analysis revealed that the most frequently used terms were "pharmacist," "pharmacy" and "professional allowances";the least used were "layoffs," "service cuts" and "patient care." Content analysis revealed 4 themes: the desire to maintain the status quo of practice, a focus on the business of pharmacy, pharmacy stakeholders' perceptions of government's attitude towards the profession and changes to patient services.Discussion: It is notable that patient care was almost completely absent from the discussion, a reflection that our profession has not embraced patient-centred care. This also represents a missed opportunity - a crisis that could have been used to move the profession towards the Blueprint's vision. We thought that the Blueprint had already achieved this consensus, but the Ontario experience has shown that this may not be the case.
机译:简介:2010年,安大略省政府提出了16号法案,除其他外,该法案取消了药剂师的专业津贴。尽管许多人不同意安大略省政府的这一单方面行动,但它也可能成为改变以患者为中心的护理的危机。我们试图研究安大略省药学界对此危机的反应,因为它与《制药蓝图》中概述的愿景有关。方法:我们系统地研究了4月至6月期间对安大略省第16号法案附表5公开可获得的反应2010年16月。使用标签或词云对数据进行了快速的文本分析,并对收集到的所有数据进行了定性的内容分析。结果:快速的文本分析显示,最常用的术语是“药剂师”,“药房”和“专业津贴”;最少使用的是“裁员”,“服务削减”和“病人护理”。内容分析揭示了四个主题:保持实践现状的愿望,对药店业务的关注,药店利益相关者对政府对专业态度的看法以及对患者服务的改变。讨论:值得注意的是,患者护理几乎是讨论中完全没有,这表明我们的专业没有接受以患者为中心的护理。这也代表了一个错失的机会-本可以用于使该行业朝着蓝图愿景发展的危机。我们认为蓝图已经达成了共识,但是安大略省的经验表明情况可能并非如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号