首页> 外文期刊>Modern Physics Letters, A >COMPARISON OF FRAMES: JORDAN VERSUS EINSTEIN FRAME FOR A NON-MINIMAL DARK ENERGY MODEL
【24h】

COMPARISON OF FRAMES: JORDAN VERSUS EINSTEIN FRAME FOR A NON-MINIMAL DARK ENERGY MODEL

机译:框架的比较:约旦对非爱因斯坦框架的非最小暗能量模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We construct a dark energy model where a scalar field non-minimally coupled to gravity plays the role of the dark component. We compare cosmological consequences of this non-minimal coupling of the scalar field and gravity in the spirit of the dark energy paradigm in Jordan and Einstein frames. Some important issues such as phantom divide line crossing, existence of the bouncing solutions and the stability of the solutions are compared in these two frames. We show that while a non-minimally coupled scalar field in the Jordan frame is a suitable dark energy component with capability to realize phantom divide line crossing, its conformal transformation in the Einstein frame does not have this capability. The conformal transformation from Jordan frame to Einstein frame transforms the equation of state parameter of the dark energy component to its minimal form with are defined scalar field and in this case it is impossible to realize a phantom phase with possible crossing of the phantom divide line.
机译:我们构建了一个暗能量模型,其中非最小耦合于重力的标量场起着暗分量的作用。我们在约旦和爱因斯坦框架的暗能量范式的精神中比较了标量场和重力的​​这种非最小耦合的宇宙学后果。在这两个框架中,比较了一些重要问题,例如幻影分界线交叉,弹跳解的存在和解的稳定性。我们表明,尽管Jordan框架中的非最小耦合标量场是具有实现幻影分割线交叉能力的合适暗能量分量,但其在爱因斯坦框架中的保形变换却没有这种能力。从约旦框架到爱因斯坦框架的共形变换将暗能量分量的状态参数方程式转换为具有定义的标量场的最小形式,在这种情况下,不可能实现与幻影分界线可能交叉的幻影相位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号