首页> 外文期刊>Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change >Can strategic technology development improve climate cooperation? A game-theoretic analysis
【24h】

Can strategic technology development improve climate cooperation? A game-theoretic analysis

机译:战略技术发展可以改善气候合作吗?博弈论分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Clean technology has figured prominently in recent debates on international climate policy. This article offers a game-theoretic investigation of the possibility and effectiveness of strategic technology development: environmental leaders setting policies that reduce the global cost of clean technology. The game-theoretic model combines technology development and adoption with pollution abatement, and it allows technology costs to differ across countries. The key theoretical findings are as follows. First, free riding is an obstacle to technology development in two ways: countries fail to fully internalize the beneficial effect of technology development on (i) global pollution abatement and (ii) the reduced cost of technology adoption in outsider countries. Second, strategic technology development can be effective when (i) a key group of frontrunner countries prefers to invest in research and development and (ii) many other countries are willing to adopt the new technology. The findings suggest that strategic technology deployment by a group of frontrunners can enable more effective climate cooperation in the future.
机译:在最近有关国际气候政策的辩论中,清洁技术占据了重要位置。本文对战略技术发展的可能性和有效性进行了博弈论研究:环境领导人制定了降低全球清洁技术成本的政策。博弈论模型将技术开发和采用与减少污染相结合,它使技术成本因国家而异。关键的理论发现如下。首先,搭便车在两个方面阻碍了技术发展:各国未能充分内化技术发展对(i)减少全球污染和(ii)减少外部国家采用技术的成本的有利影响。其次,在以下情况下,战略技术开发可能是有效的:(i)一小撮领先的国家倾向于投资于研发,并且(ii)许多其他国家愿意采用新技术。调查结果表明,由一群领先者进行的战略技术部署可以在未来实现更有效的气候合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号