首页> 外文期刊>rechtsmedizin >Errors in issuing death certificates. An analysis of 10,000 deaths from Mecklenburg
【24h】

Errors in issuing death certificates. An analysis of 10,000 deaths from Mecklenburg

机译:签发死亡证明时有误。对梅克伦堡 10,000 人死亡的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Long-lasting discussions on the problems associated with the (primary) external post-mortem examination of the corpse have so far not led to any improvements in Germany. During the second external post-mortem examination prior to cremation, the responsible physicians still encounter numerous and even serious errors made by the physicians who conducted the primary external post-mortem examination and the issuing of the death certificate.The present study assessed how many consecutive death certificates from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern have been deficiently issued in a given period in the catchment area of the Rostock crematorium and which errors were the most common. The aim was to draw conclusions from these findings for the training of medical students and physicians, on the quality/suitability of the currently valid death certificate and the quality of the current practice of external post-mortem examination in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.In this study 10,000 consecutive death certificates (part 3 of the confidential part) from August 2012 to May 2015 were evaluated for errors in form and content as well as minor and serious errors. They were grouped into the categories "clinician", "private practitioner", "emergency physician" and "unknown". The errors were defined according to the legal specifications and instructions for the issuing of death certificates.On the basis of equal ranking of minor and serious errors only 223 of the 10,000 death certificates (2.23) had been issued error-free. A total number of 38,852 errors were found in the 9777 deficiently issued death certificates (97.77). The 3116 serious errors identified were dominated by an impossible causality between cause of death and clinical findings (n = 1268, 12.68), followed by the unavailability of the physician who was responsible for the primary external post-mortem examination due to incorrect data (n = 1203, 12.03) and the lack of notation of the signs of death (n = 295, 2.95). The worst results were found among physicians who could not be classified into the categories "clinician", "private practitioner" or "emergency physician" due to the lack of entries or a personalized stamp (unknown).The current practice of issuing death certificates in Germany is unsatisfactory and should be profoundly revised. To improve the situation structural changes, the introduction of a uniform nationwide death certificate and the extension of the period of time for the issuing of death certificates are recommended.
机译:迄今为止,关于与尸体(主要)外部验尸检查相关的问题的长期讨论尚未在德国带来任何改善。在火化前的第二次体外验尸中,负责的医生仍然会遇到进行初步体检和签发死亡证明的医生所犯的许多甚至严重的错误。本研究评估了在罗斯托克火葬场集水区某段时间内,梅克伦堡-前波莫瑞州连续签发了多少份死亡证明,哪些错误是最常见的。目的是从这些调查结果中得出结论,用于培训医学生和医生,了解目前有效的死亡证明的质量/适用性以及梅克伦堡-前波莫瑞州目前外部尸检实践的质量。在这项研究中,从2012年8月到2015年5月,对10,000份连续的死亡证明(机密部分的第3部分)进行了形式和内容错误以及轻微和严重错误的评估。他们被分为“临床医生”、“私人医生”、“急诊医生”和“未知”类别。这些错误是根据签发死亡证明的法律规范和说明确定的。在轻微错误和严重错误排名相等的基础上,10,000份死亡证明中只有223份(2.23%)没有错误。在9777份缺位签发的死亡证明中,共发现错误38852个(97.77%)。确定的3116个严重错误主要是死因和临床发现之间不可能的因果关系(n=1268,12.68%),其次是由于数据不正确(n=1203,12.03%)和缺乏死亡迹象的符号(n=295, 2.95%).最差的结果是在医生中发现的,由于缺乏条目或个性化印章(未知),无法归类为“临床医生”、“私人医生”或“急诊医生”类别。德国目前签发死亡证明的做法并不令人满意,应该进行深刻的修改。为了改善这种情况,结构性变化,建议在全国范围内实行统一的死亡证明,并延长签发死亡证明的期限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号