首页> 外文期刊>Mineralogy and Petrology >Visualization of trace-element zoning in fluorapatite using BSE and CL imaging, and EPMA and mu PIXE/mu PIGE mapping
【24h】

Visualization of trace-element zoning in fluorapatite using BSE and CL imaging, and EPMA and mu PIXE/mu PIGE mapping

机译:使用BSE和CL成像以及EPMA和mu PIXE / mu PIGE映射可视化氟磷灰石中的痕量元素分区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, zonation patterns of trace elements in fluorapatite are discussed that were visualized using four analytical techniques, namely back-scattered electrons (BSE) and cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging, electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA), and micro-proton-induced X-ray/gamma ray emission (mu PIXE/mu PIGE) mapping. Each method demonstrates the in-grain compositional variations in a slightly different way. Both BSE and CL provide qualitative data, and the internal textures are displayed in most detail. Additionally, CL points to specific elements enriched in certain growth zones. Qualitative EPMA maps show detailed zonation patterns for specific elements (with high spatial resolution), which are in general correspondence with the patterns observed in BSE and CL images. The mu PIXE/mu PIGE maps are fully quantitative and the detection limits are relatively low compared to EPMA mapping. In present spot measurements mu PIXE demonstrates lower detection limits than EPMA, however, the latter could be considerably improved by extending the acquisition times. There is no significant overlap of REE (rare earth elements) peaks in the acquired mu PIXE energy spectra, however, when multiple REEs are present with sufficiently high concentrations, peak deconvolution may pose some difficulties. Spatial resolution of mu PIXE/mu PIGE images is not sufficiently high to reflect minor textural features, which also result from the greater interaction depth of the proton beam. However, major growth zones are distinguishable. Even though each method has their advantages and limitations, when applied together, they provide an almost complete characterization of compositional variability in trace-element-bearing minerals.
机译:本文讨论了氟磷灰石中微量元素的分区模式,使用四种分析技术将其可视化,即背向散射电子(BSE)和阴极发光(CL)成像,电子探针微分析(EPMA)和微质子诱导的X射线/γ射线发射(μPIXE /μPIGE)作图。每种方法都以稍微不同的方式演示了晶粒内的成分变化。 BSE和CL均提供定性数据,并且内部纹理显示得最详细。此外,CL指出了某些生长区域富集的特定元素。定性的EPMA贴图显示了特定元素(具有较高的空间分辨率)的详细分区模式,这些分区模式通常与BSE和CL图像中观察到的模式相对应。与EPMA映射相比,μPIXE /μPIGE图是完全定量的,并且检测限相对较低。在目前的现场测量中,μPIXE的检测极限比EPMA更低,但是可以通过延长采集时间来大大改善后者。在所获取的mu PIXE能谱中,REE(稀土元素)峰没有明显的重叠,但是,当存在多个具有足够高浓度的REE时,峰去卷积可能会带来一些困难。 mu PIXE / mu PIGE图像的空间分辨率不足以反映较小的纹理特征,这也是由于质子束的相互作用深度较大而引起的。但是,主要的增长区是可以区分的。尽管每种方法都有其优点和局限性,但当一起使用时,它们几乎可以完全表征含微量元素矿物的成分变异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号