...
首页> 外文期刊>Business Law International >Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd [2011] UKSC 38
【24h】

Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd [2011] UKSC 38

机译:Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited诉BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd [2011] UKSC 38

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The insolvency of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 reignited interest in a principle of English insolvency law which has come to be known as the anti-deprivation principle. In July 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd. The decision was keenly anticipated in legal and structured finance circles. Yet the decision was something of a disappointment. Despite the complexity of the issues involved, the majority in the Supreme Court took a rather simplistic approach to the anti-deprivation principle. This note will analyse some of the key issues arising from the decision.
机译:雷曼兄弟公司(Lehman Brothers)于2008年9月破产,这引起了人们对英国破产法原则的关注,该原则已被称为反剥夺原则。 2011年7月,最高法院在Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited诉BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd案中下达了该裁决。法律和结构性金融界都强烈期待该裁决。然而,这一决定令人失望。尽管所涉问题十分复杂,但最高法院的大多数人还是对反剥夺原则采取了相当简单的态度。本说明将分析该决定引起的一些关键问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号