...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Accuracy of the non-sentinel node risk score (N-SNORE) in patients with cutaneous melanoma and positive sentinel lymph nodes: A retrospective study
【24h】

Accuracy of the non-sentinel node risk score (N-SNORE) in patients with cutaneous melanoma and positive sentinel lymph nodes: A retrospective study

机译:皮肤黑色素瘤和前哨淋巴结阳性的非前哨淋巴结风险评分(N-SNORE)的准确性:一项回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Sentinel node (SLN) biopsy in patients with melanoma permits identification of those at risk for further metastases in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN). However, a mere 20% of SLN-positive patients have metastases in NSLN. Therefore we need criteria to predict NSLN-positivity. A new score system known as the non-sentinel risk score, (N-SNORE) based on five clinical and pathological characteristics (gender, regression in primary melanoma, proportion of SNs containing melanoma, perinodal lymphatic invasion, and SN tumor burden), was first published in 2010. In this study, the accuracy of N-SNORE was validated in melanoma patients with positive SLN. Methods A total of 106 melanoma patients with positive SLN, who had undergone complete lymph node dissection (CLND) subsequently, were included in the study. The N-SNORE was calculated in all patients, and the risk was compared to the frequency of NSLN metastases. Statistical analysis of the data was performed. Results Thirteen patients were at very low risk for NSN metastasis (score 0), 63 patients at low risk (score 1-3), 19 at intermediate risk (score 4-5), 6 at high risk (score 6-7), and 5 at very high risk (score >8). NSLN positivity rates for these 5 risk groups were 7.7%, 18.2%, 21.1%, 33.3%, and 80%, respectively. According to Fisher's exact test, the contingency coefficient was.322; the p-value was.025. Conclusion An increasing N-SNORE was clearly correlated with a higher risk of NSLN positivity. Based on the p-value and the contingency coefficient, the overall accuracy of the N-SNORE was proven on statistical calculation.
机译:背景黑色素瘤患者的前哨淋巴结活检可以识别出那些有可能在非前哨淋巴结进一步转移的患者。但是,只有20%的SLN阳性患者发生NSLN转移。因此,我们需要标准来预测NSLN阳性。基于五个临床和病理特征(性别,原发性黑色素瘤消退,含黑色素瘤的SN比例,淋巴结浸润和SN肿瘤负荷),建立了一个新的评分系统,称为非前哨风险评分(N-SNORE)。首次发表于2010年。在这项研究中,N-SNORE的准确性已在SLN阳性的黑色素瘤患者中得到验证。方法总共106例SLN阳性的黑色素瘤患者随后接受了完全淋巴结清扫(CLND)。计算所有患者的N-SNORE,并将风险与NSLN转移的频率进行比较。对数据进行统计分析。结果13例NSN转移风险极低(评分0),63例低风险(评分1-3),19例中度风险(评分4-5),6例高危(评分6-7),和5个风险很高(得分> 8)。这5个风险组的NSLN阳性率分别为7.7%,18.2%,21.1%,33.3%和80%。根据Fisher的精确检验,或有系数为322。 p值为025。结论N-SNORE升高与NSLN阳性风险增加明显相关。基于p值和权变系数,通过统计计算证明了N-SNORE的总体准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号