首页> 外文期刊>MIM: Motor Industry Magazine >THE PARTS QUALITY CONUNDRUM
【24h】

THE PARTS QUALITY CONUNDRUM

机译:零件质量委员会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Motor Industry Magazine editor Tim Kiek reprises one of the industry's longest running debates: should there be a parts quality standard? Before assuming editorship of MIM, I presided over a magazine targeted at aftermarket professionals working in distribution. During my tenure at this title one issue raised its head more than any other. The issue in question was parts quality: in particular whether there should be more efforts to implement some form of standard. The debate was passionate, vociferous and incredibly complex: involving parties with many different agendas. The intricacies of the case for and against are if anything exacerbated when the debate is broadened to encompass not just the aftermarket, but the wider industry: perhaps most pertinently vehicle manufacturers. Before I embark on the main thrust of the arguments for and against a parts standard and speak to a variety industry figures to gather their opinions, it is important to set the context for the debate.
机译:《汽车工业》杂志编辑蒂姆·基耶克(Tim Kiek)对业内持续时间最长的辩论之一进行了谴责:是否应制定零件质量标准?在担任MIM的编辑之前,我主持了一本针对发行后售后市场专业人士的杂志。在我担任本职期间,有一个问题比任何其他问题都更加突出。有问题的是零件质量:特别是是否应该为实施某种形式的标准付出更多的努力。辩论是充满激情,激烈和难以置信的复杂:涉及具有许多不同议程的政党。当辩论扩大到不仅包括售后市场,还包括更广泛的行业:也许是最相关的汽车制造商时,赞成和反对的错综复杂的情况加剧了。在我开始支持和反对零件标准的争论的主旨并与各种行业人士交谈以征询他们的意见之前,重要的是确定辩论的背景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号