...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Radial scar, complex sclerosing lesion and risk of breast cancer. Analysis of 175 cases in Northern Ireland.
【24h】

Radial scar, complex sclerosing lesion and risk of breast cancer. Analysis of 175 cases in Northern Ireland.

机译:scar疤,复杂硬化性病变和罹患乳腺癌的风险。对北爱尔兰的175例病例进行分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists over the nomenclature and clinical significance of radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion (RS/CSL) of the breast. A retrospective analysis of cases diagnosed from 1988 to 2001 in Northern Ireland was performed to determine if any clinical difference exists between the diagnoses of radial scar and complex sclerosing lesion, and establish if lesions suggestive of RS/CSL require excision and/or follow-up. PATIENTS: Patients with a diagnosis of RS/CSL from 1988 to 2001 were identified from the databases of the pathology laboratories serving specialist breast surgical units and the Northern Ireland Breast Screening Programme. RESULTS: True RS/CSL was confirmed in 175 of 230 cases. There was no difference between RS and CSL regarding associated pathology in the specimen. 16.9% of cases identified at symptomatic clinics were associated with carcinoma in situ, and 15.7% with invasive breast carcinoma, compared to 4.7 and 2.3%, respectively in the screen detected group. One later carcinoma was found. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clinical difference between the entities radial scar and complex sclerosing lesion. RS/CSL require excision due to their association with malignancy. In the absence of any independent risk factor for carcinoma no further follow-up of patients with RS/CSL is required.
机译:背景:关于乳房放射状疤痕/复合硬化病变(RS / CSL)的命名和临床意义存在争议。对北爱尔兰1988年至2001年确诊的病例进行回顾性分析,以确定radial骨瘢痕和复杂硬化性病变的诊断之间是否存在任何临床差异,并确定是否提示RS / CSL的病变需要切除和/或随访。患者:从服务于专业乳腺外科部门和北爱尔兰乳腺筛查计划的病理实验室数据库中鉴定出1988年至2001年诊断为RS / CSL的患者。结果:230例病例中有175例确诊为真正的RS / CSL。对于标本中的相关病理,RS和CSL之间没有差异。在有症状的诊所中发现的病例中,有16.9%与原位癌有关,而与浸润性乳腺癌有关的占15.7%,相比之下,筛查检测组的患病率为4.7%和2.3%。发现了后来的一种癌。结论:放射状瘢痕和复杂硬化性病变之间无临床差异。 RS / CSL因其与恶性肿瘤相关而需要切除。在没有任何独立的癌症危险因素的情况下,不需要对RS / CSL患者进行进一步的随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号