...
首页> 外文期刊>Microvascular Research: An International Journal >Comparison of infrared thermography and laser speckle contrast imaging for the dynamic assessment of digital microvascular function
【24h】

Comparison of infrared thermography and laser speckle contrast imaging for the dynamic assessment of digital microvascular function

机译:红外热成像和激光散斑对比度成像在数字微血管功能动态评估中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is a novel non-invasive microvascular imaging modality. The present study evaluates the validity and reliability of LSCI by comparison with infrared thermography (IRT) for the dynamic assessment of digital microvascular function in healthy volunteers. Methods: Subjects attended on 3 occasions. Simultaneous assessment of cutaneous perfusion at 3 distinct regions of interest (ROI) within the hands was undertaken using LSCI and infrared thermography (IRT) at baseline, and at 13. s intervals over 15. min following a standardised local cold challenge. Endpoints for evaluation included absolute measurements at baseline and following cold stress, in addition to the characteristics of the re-warming curves (maximum % recovery and maximum gradient). Visits 1 and 2 were undertaken in identical conditions (ambient temperature 23 °C) to assess reproducibility, whereas visit 3 was undertaken at a lower ambient room temperature of 18 °C to evaluate responsiveness to reduction in ambient room temperature. Results: Fourteen healthy participants completed the study. There was greater variability in the data generated using LSCI compared with the highly damped IRT, reflecting greater sensitivity of LSCI to physiological variation and movement artefact. LSCI and IRT correlated well at baseline and following cold challenge for all endpoints (r s for pooled data between 0.5 and 0.65, p0.00005). Reproducibility of both IRT and LSCI was excellent (ICCs0.75) for absolute assessments but lower for re-warming curve characteristics. LSCI provides greater spatial resolution than IRT identifying variation in cutaneous perfusion within the hands most likely associated with the presence of arteriovenous anastamoses. Both techniques were responsive to reduction in ambient room temperature. Effect sizes were greatest for IRT than LSCI (e.g. -1.17 vs. -0.85 at ROI 1 at baseline) although this may represent heat transfer rather than altered vascular perfusion. Discussion: In the dynamic assessment of digital vascular perfusion, LSCI correlates well with IRT, is reproducible and responsive to reduction in ambient room temperature. Absolute measurements appear preferable to parameters derived from re-warming curve characteristics when assessing digital perfusion following cold challenge. The greater temporal and spatial resolution of LSCI compared with IRT may facilitate the development of novel assessment tools of autonomic function and digital cutaneous perfusion.
机译:目的:激光散斑对比成像(LSCI)是一种新型的非侵入性微血管成像方式。本研究通过与红外热成像(IRT)进行比较,评估LSCI的有效性和可靠性,以动态评估健康志愿者的数字微血管功能。方法:受试者参加了3次。在基线时,在标准局部感冒后的15分钟内,使用LSCI和红外热成像(IRT)同时评估手中3个不同的关注区域(ROI)的皮肤灌注情况。评估的终点包括基线和冷应力后的绝对测量值,以及再升温曲线的特征(最大回收率和最大梯度)。访问1和2在相同条件下(环境温度23°C)进行,以评估可重复性,而访问3在较低的室温18°C下进行,以评估对降低室温的响应能力。结果:14名健康参与者完成了研究。与高度阻尼的IRT相比,使用LSCI生成的数据具有更大的可变性,这反映了LSCI对生理变化和运动伪影的更大敏感性。 LSCI和IRT在基线和所有挑战的冷挑战后均具有很好的相关性(汇总数据的r s在0.5到0.65之间,p <0.00005)。对于绝对评估,IRT和LSCI的重现性均极佳(ICC> 0.75),但对升温曲线特性而言,其重现性较低。与IRT相比,LSCI可以提供更大的空间分辨率,从而可以识别出与动静脉吻合术相关的手内皮肤灌注变化。两种技术都对环境室温的降低作出响应。虽然IRT的效应大小比LSCI大(例如,在基线为ROI 1时为-1.17对-0.85),但可能代表传热而不是改变血管灌注。讨论:在数字血管灌注的动态评估中,LSCI与IRT密切相关,具有可重现性,并且对室温的降低有反应。在评估冷刺激后的数字灌注时,绝对测量似乎优于从重新加温曲线特征得出的参数。与IRT相比,LSCI具有更高的时空分辨率,可以促进自主功能和数字皮肤灌注的新型评估工具的开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号