首页> 外文期刊>Midwifery >Scolders, carers or friends: South African midwives' contrasting styles of communication when discussing smoking cessation with pregnant women.
【24h】

Scolders, carers or friends: South African midwives' contrasting styles of communication when discussing smoking cessation with pregnant women.

机译:骂人,照顾者或朋友:南非助产士与孕妇讨论戒烟时的交流方式截然不同。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: to investigate how midwives are currently communicating with women about smoking during pregnancy with a view to involving them in a smoking cessation intervention in antenatal clinics. DESIGN: a qualitative study using individual, in-depth interviews for data collection. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 24 nurses providing antenatal care to pregnant smokers attending public sector clinics in five major cities in South Africa. FINDINGS: three archetypes of midwives, characterised by different styles of communication and approaches to smoking cessation, emerged from the analysis of the interview data. These were described as the 'Angry Scolders', the 'Benign Carers' and the 'Enthusiastic Friends'. The first type conformed to the traditional, authoritarian style of communication, where the midwife assumed a dominant, expert role. When women failed to comply with their advice, these midwives typically became angry and confrontational. The second type of midwife used a paternalistic communication style and emphasised the role of education in changing behaviour. However, these midwives had little confidence that they could influence women to quit. The third type embraced a patient-centred approach, consciously encouraging more interaction with their patients and attempting to understand change from their point of view. These midwives were optimistic of women's capacity to change and more satisfied with their current health education efforts than the first two types. The Benign Carers and Enthusiastic Friends were more open to participation in the potential intervention than the Angry Scolders. KEY CONCLUSIONS: the prevailing traditional, authoritarian style of communication is inappropriate for smoking cessation education and counselling as it provokes resistance and avoidance on the part of pregnant smokers. The paternalistic approach appears to be largely ineffectual, whereas the patient-centred approach elicits the most positive response from pregnant women and enhances the possibility of a trusting and cooperative relationship with the midwife. Midwives using this style are more open to fulfilling their role in smoking cessation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: smoking cessation interventions need to attend to not only what midwives say to pregnant women about smoking, but also how they communicate about the issue. The use of a patient-centred approach, such as brief motivational interviewing, is recommended as a means of improving counselling outcomes among pregnant smokers.
机译:目的:调查助产士目前如何与妇女就怀孕期间的吸烟进行沟通,以期使她们参与产前诊所的戒烟干预。设计:定性研究,使用单独的深入访谈进行数据收集。场所和参与者:24名护士为在南非五个主要城市的公共部门诊所就诊的孕妇吸烟者提供产前护理。结果:对访谈数据的分析得出了三种助产士原型,其特征在于不同的沟通方式和戒烟方法。这些被描述为“愤怒的责骂者”,“良性照顾者”和“热情的朋友”。第一种类型符合传统的威权主义沟通方式,助产士扮演着主要的专家角色。当妇女不遵守她们的建议时,这些助产士通常会变得生气和对抗。第二类助产士使用家长式的沟通方式,强调教育在改变行为方面的作用。但是,这些助产士几乎没有信心可以影响女性戒烟。第三类采用以患者为中心的方法,有意识地鼓励与患者的更多互动,并尝试从患者的角度理解变化。这些助产士对妇女的改变能力持乐观态度,并且对她们当前的健康教育工作比前两种类型更为满意。与愤怒的责骂者相比,良性的照顾者和热情的朋友更愿意参与潜在的干预。关键结论:流行的传统的,专制的沟通方式不适合戒烟教育和咨询,因为它引起了孕妇吸烟者的抵制和避免。家长式的方法似乎无效,而以患者为中心的方法引起了孕妇的最积极的回应,并增加了与助产士建立信任与合作关系的可能性。使用这种风格的助产士更愿意履行其在戒烟中的作用。实践的意义:戒烟干预措施不仅需要关注助产士对孕妇所说的吸烟问题,还需要关注他们如何就此问题进行沟通。建议使用以患者为中心的方法,例如简短的动机访谈,以改善孕妇吸烟者的咨询效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号