首页> 外文期刊>Meteorological applications >Understanding forecast verification statistics
【24h】

Understanding forecast verification statistics

机译:了解预测验证统计信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although there are numerous reasons for performing a verification analysis, there are usually two general questions that are of interest: are the forecasts good, and can we be confident that the estimate of forecast quality is not misleading? When calculating a verification score, it is not usually obvious how the score can answer either of these questions. Some procedures for attempting to answer the questions are reviewed, with particular focus on p-values and confidence intervals. P-values are shown to be rather unhelpful in answering either question, especially when applied to probabilistic verification scores, and confidence intervals are to be preferred. However, confidence intervals cannot reveal biases in the value of a score that arises from an inadequate experimental design for testing on truly out-of-sample observations. Some specific problems with cross validation are highlighted. Finally, in the interests of increasing the insight into forecast strengths and weaknesses and in pointing towards methods for improving forecast quality, a plea is made for a more discriminating selection of verification procedures than has been adopted to date. Copyright (c) 2008 Royal Meteorological Society.
机译:尽管执行验证分析的原因很多,但通常有两个有趣的一般问题:预测是否良好,我们能否确信对预测质量的估计不会产生误导?在计算验证分数时,通常不清楚分数如何回答以上两个问题。对尝试回答问题的一些程序进行了回顾,尤其关注p值和置信区间。 P值被证明对回答任何一个问题都无济于事,尤其是当应用于概率验证分数时,P值是可取的。但是,置信区间不能显示由于对真实样本外观察进行测试的实验设计不足而导致的评分值存在偏差。强调了交叉验证的一些特定问题。最后,为了增加对预测优势和劣势的洞察力,并指出提高预测质量的方法,人们呼吁选择比迄今为止采用的更具区分性的验证程序。版权所有(c)2008皇家气象学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号