...
首页> 外文期刊>Meteorological applications >Terminal aerodrome forecast verification in Austro Control using time windows and ranges of forecast conditions
【24h】

Terminal aerodrome forecast verification in Austro Control using time windows and ranges of forecast conditions

机译:使用时间窗和预报条件范围在Austro Control中对终端机场进行预报验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Terminal aerodrome forecasts (TAFs) are widely used meteorological forecasts for flight planning. Therefore, there is considerable interest in assessing their accuracy, skill and value. TAFs give information about the expected conditions of wind, visibility, significant weather and clouds at airports. Using different types of change groups, the forecaster gives a range of possible values valid for a time interval, the shortest interval being 1 h. A TAF thus contains a range of forecast conditions for each hour. Point verification has proved to be difficult for TAFs. To ease these difficulties, time and meteorological state constraints are relaxed in the method described in this paper. This is done by verifying two conditions for each hour of the TAR The highest (or most favourable) observed value is used to score the highest forecast value, and the lowest (or most adverse) observed value is used to score the lowest forecast value. Entries are made accordingly into two contingency tables. The contingency tables are specific for weather element and lead time. Verification results should give feedback to forecasters. Contingency tables show the strengths and weaknesses of TAF, and displays for individual TAFs are available in the sense of 'eyeball verification'. For management information, common verification measures for categorical events (such as the Gerrity Score and the Heidke Skill Score) are calculated from the contingency tables. For answering specific customer questions, verification results in respect to certain values of weather elements are available. Copyright (c) 2008 Royal Meteorological Society.
机译:终端机场预报(TAF)是广泛用于飞行计划的气象预报。因此,在评估其准确性,技能和价值方面引起了极大的兴趣。 TAF提供有关机场风,能见度,重大天气和云的预期状况的信息。预测器使用不同类型的更改组,给出了在一个时间间隔内有效的一系列可能值,最短间隔为1小时。因此,TAF包含每个小时的一系列预测条件。事实证明,TAF很难进行点验证。为了缓解这些困难,本文描述的方法放松了时间和气象状态约束。这是通过验证TAR每小时的两个条件来完成的。最高(或最有利)观察值用于对最高预测值进行评分,最低(或最不利)观察值用于对最低预测值进行评分。相应地将条目录入两个列联表中。列联表特定于天气要素和提前期。验证结果应向预报员提供反馈。列联表显示了TAF的优缺点,并且在“眼球验证”的意义上可以显示单个TAF。对于管理信息,从意外事件表中计算了针对类别事件的通用验证度量(例如Gerrity得分和Heidke技能得分)。为了回答特定的客户问题,可以获得有关某些天气要素值的验证结果。版权所有(c)2008皇家气象学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号