【24h】

Effects of differences in hardness measurement procedures on the traceability chain and calibration process

机译:硬度测量程序差异对溯源链和校准过程的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Establishment of traceability in hardness measurement is still under discussion at the ISO TC 164 SC 3 subcommittee on hardness testing. Two paths for establishing traceability are proposed for the Rockwell hardness measurement in ISO 6508-1. One way is taking a route to SI units through direct calibration of machine components, and the other way is taking a route to a hardness measurement standard through indirect calibration of machine performance. In addition to this, the difference in hardness measurement procedures between Rockwell and Brinell/Vickers hardness causes further confusion in establishing a traceability chain and an uncertainty evaluation process. This confusion is partly caused by the characteristics of hardness value, i.e. a procedure-dependent property. In this paper, methods used for the establishment of traceability for Rockwell, Brinell and Vickers hardness measurements are discussed based on the concept defined in the VIM.
机译:ISO TC 164 SC 3硬度测试小组委员会仍在讨论建立硬度测量的可追溯性。在ISO 6508-1中提出了两种建立可追溯性的途径来进行洛氏硬度测量。一种方法是通过直接校准机器部件来达到国际单位制,另一种方法是通过间接校准机器性能来达到硬度测量标准。除此之外,洛氏硬度和布氏硬度/维氏硬度之间的硬度测量程序差异还导致在建立可追溯性链和不确定性评估过程时造成进一步的混乱。这种混淆部分是由硬度值的特性即与程序有关的特性引起的。在本文中,基于VIM中定义的概念,讨论了用于建立洛氏硬度,布氏硬度和维氏硬度的可追溯性的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号