首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model.
【24h】

Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model.

机译:与使用尸体模型的喉罩气道Classic和ProSeal相比,新型上咽气道器械I-Gel的食道密封。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic (cLMA) and ProSeal (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure. METHODS: The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured. RESULTS: During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H(2)O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H(2)O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H(2)O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H(2)O, the cLMA of 46 cm H(2)O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H(2)O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel. CONCLUSIONS: Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.
机译:背景:声门上气道装置越来越多地用于麻醉和急诊医学中。这项研究旨在研究新型上咽上气道装置I-Gel(I-Gel)的食管密封情况,并与高位模型中的两个喉罩气道经典(cLMA)和ProSeal(pLMA)进行比较食道压力。方法:将三个咽上气道装置插入八个裸露的食管未固定尸体模型中,这些模型已连接到水柱,导致食管压力缓慢增加和快速增加。测量在缓慢和快速压力增加期间直至食管密封丧失为止所施加的压力。结果:在缓慢的压力增加过程中,pLMA承受的食管压力高达中位数58 cm H(2)O,而cLMA能够阻止食道的中位数高达37 cm H(2)O,并且I-Gel在13 cm H(2)O处已经失去密封。施加最大压力一分钟后,pLMA承受了59 cm H(2)O的食管压力,46 cm H(2)O的cLMA和21 cm H(2)O的I-Gel气道。通过pLMA和I-Gel的食管腔实现了食管液的快速释放。结论:pLMA和cLMA都比新型I-Gel气道更好地密封了食道。 pLMA和I-Gel通过食道内腔快速排出胃肠液。因此,可以防止气管抽吸的使用。有必要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号