首页> 外文期刊>Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental >Co-associations between insulin sensitivity and measures of liver function, subclinical inflammation, and hematology.
【24h】

Co-associations between insulin sensitivity and measures of liver function, subclinical inflammation, and hematology.

机译:胰岛素敏感性与肝功能,亚临床炎症和血液学指标之间的关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Clustering of risk factors for coronary heart disease and diabetes is well established, particularly in relation to insulin resistance. To determine whether evaluation of risk factor clustering will contribute to risk assessment, it is first necessary to discriminate co-association between risk factors from correlation. We undertook this in a large homogenous group, using a sophisticated measure of insulin sensitivity and a broad range of risk factors. Cross-sectional analysis of an occupational cohort using regression and factor analyses was performed. Subjects were 472 apparently healthy white men. The main outcome measures were insulin sensitivity, S(I), by minimal model analysis of the intravenous glucose tolerance test plus liver function and hematologic variables, including the inflammation indices, leukocyte count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The S(I) correlated independently with serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate transaminase, and alkaline phosphatase activities; blood pressure; leukocyte count; and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P < .01). On factor analysis, the factor that explained the greatest proportion of the variance (56.7%) included, in decreasing order of factor loading, triglycerides, S(I) (negative), body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (negative), insulin, uric acid, and GGT activity (loadings >0.40). Mean arterial pressure was not a feature (loading 0.29), neither were indices of subclinical inflammation. In apparently healthy men, blood pressure and indices of subclinical inflammation do not cluster with other insulin resistance-related risk factors, despite correlating with insulin sensitivity. In contrast, both GGT activity and uric acid concentrations correlated with insulin sensitivity and co-associated with insulin resistance-related risk factors and are therefore components of a true risk factor cluster.
机译:冠心病和糖尿病的危险因素的聚类是公认的,特别是在胰岛素抵抗方面。为了确定风险因素聚类的评估是否将有助于风险评估,首先必须从关联中区分风险因素之间的关联。我们在一个大型同质小组中进行了这项研究,使用了复杂的胰岛素敏感性测量方法和多种危险因素。使用回归和因素分析对职业人群进行横断面分析。受试者为472名显然健康的白人。主要结果指标为胰岛素敏感性S(I),通过对静脉葡萄糖耐量试验的最小模型分析以及肝功能和血液学变量进行分析,包括炎症指标,白细胞计数和红细胞沉降率。 S(I)与血清γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT),天冬氨酸转氨酶和碱性磷酸酶活性独立相关;血压;白细胞计数和红细胞沉降率(P <.01)。在因子分析中,解释方差最大比例的因子(56.7%)包括按因子加载的降序排列的甘油三酸酯,S(I)(阴性),体重指数,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(阴性),胰岛素,尿酸和GGT活性(负荷> 0.40)。平均动脉压不是特征(负荷为0.29),亚临床炎症指标也不是。在显然健康的男性中,尽管血压和亚临床炎症指标与胰岛素敏感性相关,但并未与其他胰岛素抵抗相关危险因素成簇。相反,GGT活性和尿酸浓度均与胰岛素敏感性相关,并且与胰岛素抵抗相关的危险因素共同相关,因此是真正危险因素群的组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号