...
首页> 外文期刊>Methods of information in medicine >Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX.
【24h】

Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX.

机译:使用SAS PROC GLIMMIX进行敏感性和特异性的双变量随机荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Meta-analysis allows to summarize pooled sensitivities and specificities from several primary diagnostic test accuracy studies. Often these pooled estimates are indirectly obtained from a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) analysis. This article presents a generalized linear random-effects model with the new SAS PROC GLIMMIX that obtains the pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity directly. METHODS: Firstly, the formula of the bivariate random-effects model is presented in context with the literature. Then its implementation with the new SAS PROC GLIMMIX is empirically evaluated in comparison to the indirect HSROC approach, utilizing the published 2 x 2 count data of 50 meta-analyses. RESULTS: According to the empirical evaluation the meta-analytic results from the bivariate GLIMMIX approach are nearly identical to the results from the indirect HSROC approach. CONCLUSIONS: A generalized linear mixed model with PROC GLIMMIX offers a straightforward method for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
机译:目的:荟萃分析可以总结来自几项主要诊断测试准确性研究的合并敏感性和特异性。通常,这些汇总的估计值是从分层汇总接收器操作特征(HSROC)分析中间接获得的。本文介绍了使用新的SAS PROC GLIMMIX的广义线性随机效应模型,该模型可直接获得敏感性和特异性的汇总估计。方法:首先,结合文献介绍了双变量随机效应模型的公式。然后,与已发布的2 x 2计数数据(共50项荟萃分析)相比,与间接HSROC方法相比,将通过经验评估新SAS PROC GLIMMIX在新SAS PROC GLIMMIX上的实施情况。结果:根据经验评估,双变量GLIMMIX方法的荟萃分析结果与间接HSROC方法的结果几乎相同。结论:带有PROC GLIMMIX的广义线性混合模型为敏感性和特异性的二元随机效应荟萃分析提供了一种简单的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号