...
首页> 外文期刊>Methods in Ecology and Evolution >Revisiting resource selection probability functions and single-visit methods: clarification and extensions
【24h】

Revisiting resource selection probability functions and single-visit methods: clarification and extensions

机译:回顾资源选择概率函数和单次访问方法:澄清和扩展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Models accounting for imperfect detection are important. Single-visit (SV) methods have been proposed as an alternative to multiple-visit methods to relax the assumption of closed population. Knape & Korner-Nievergelt (Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2015) showed that under certain models of probability of detection, SV methods are statistically non-identifiable leading to biased population estimates. There is a close relationship between estimation of the resource selection probability function (RSPF) using weighted distributions and SV methods for occupancy and abundance estimation. We explain the precise mathematical conditions needed for RSPF estimation as stated in Lele & Keim (Ecology, 87, 2006, 3021). The identical conditions that remained unstated in our papers on SV methodology are needed for SV methodology to work. We show that the class of admissible models is quite broad and does not excessively restrict the application of the RSPF or the SV methodology. To complement the work by Knape and Korner-Nievergelt, we study the performance of multiple-visit methods under the scaled logistic detection function and a much wider set of situations. In general, under the scaled logistic detection function, multiple-visit methods also lead to biased estimates. As a solution to this problem, we extend the SV methodology to a class of models that allows use of scaled probability function. We propose a multinomial extension of SV methodology that can be used to check whether the detection function satisfies the RSPF condition or not. Furthermore, we show that if the scaling factor depends on covariates, then it can also be estimated. We argue that the instances where the RSPF condition is not satisfied are rare in practice. Hence, we disagree with the implication in Knape & Korner-Nievergelt (Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2015) that the need for RSPF condition makes SV methodology irrelevant in practice.
机译:不完善检测的模型很重要。提出了单次访问(SV)方法作为多次访问方法的替代方法,以放松对封闭人口的假设。 Knape和Korner-Nievergelt(《生态学与进化论方法》,2015年)表明,在某些检测概率模型下,SV方法在统计上是无法识别的,从而导致人口估计数出现偏差。使用加权分布的资源选择概率函数(RSPF)的估计与占用和丰度估计的SV方法之间存在密切关系。如Lele&Keim(Ecology,87,2006,3021)中所述,我们解释了RSPF估计所需的精确数学条件。要使SV方法论发挥作用,就需要我们在SV方法论论文中未阐明的相同条件。我们表明,可接纳模型的类别非常广泛,并且不会过度限制RSPF或SV方法的应用。为了补充Knape和Korner-Nievergelt的工作,我们在规模后勤检测功能和更广泛的情况下研究了多次访问方法的性能。通常,在规模化后勤检测功能下,多次访问方法也会导致估计偏差。作为此问题的解决方案,我们将SV方法扩展到一类模型,该模型允许使用缩放概率函数。我们提出了SV方法的多项式扩展,可用于检查检测功能是否满足RSPF条件。此外,我们表明,如果缩放因子取决于协变量,那么也可以对其进行估计。我们认为在实践中很少满足RSPF条件的情况很少。因此,我们不同意Knape和Korner-Nievergelt(《生态学与进化论方法》,2015年)中对RSPF条件的需求,这使得SV方法论在实践中无关紧要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号