...
首页> 外文期刊>Medycyna Weterynaryjna >Economic gains or losses resulting from the chilling of poultry
【24h】

Economic gains or losses resulting from the chilling of poultry

机译:禽类变冷导致的经济损益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of the reasearch was to evaluate gains and losses to producers and consumers of poultry which result from the application of diverse methods of chilling poultry carcasses.The research was carried out on 120 carcasses of slaughter chickens chilled by three different systems, i.e. air chilling, immersion chilling and evaporative chilling, 40 carcasses from each system. Weight losses or gains of the carcasses before and after chilling were initially established by the so-called plant method. The weight was measured directly after gutting and the removal of giblets and fat, but before the first washing. Each carcass was weighed to an accuracy of one gram. Then the carcasses were hanged again on the slaughter line, where they underwent the processes of washing, chilling and draining. Following the above, the carcasses were weighed for the second time. The following parameters were calculated: the average weight gain or loss of the carcass after chilling (g/carcass); the average weight gain or loss of the carcass after chilling (g/kg); the relative weight gain or loss of the carcass after chilling CIAO. Next, the chilling systems under examination were evaluated in terms of economic gains or losses to the poultry plant and the poultry consumer. Economic analysis involved the following indicators: the gain or loss to the plant during processing (PLN/carcass); the yearly gain or loss to the plant during chilling (PLN); the gain or loss to the plant during chilling (PLN/kg of sales); the gain or loss to the consumer resulting from chilling (PLN/kg purchased); the yearly gain or loss to the consumer; the yearly gain or loss to the social budget resulting from the choice of a specific chilling method and the yearly slaughter of chickensIt was found that the carcass weight after chilling varied significantly depending on the chilling method applied. The air chilling system reduced the carcass weight on average by 2.31%. The other two chilling methods caused an increase in the carcass weight, which was greater in the immersion system: on average by 3.45%. Also the evaporative system caused the carcass weigh to grow but to a lesser extent than the immersion one: on average by 2.63%. The immersion chilling proves the most profitable to the producer. This method produces the greatest gains in the carcass weigh, consisting mainly in increased free water content in meat. The plant gains 0.20 PLN per 1 kg of meat, but the yearly gain amounts to as much as 3,449,605 PLN. The evaporative system is also profitable to the producer but the economic gain is somewhat smaller than in the immersion system. From the producer's point of view the least desirable is chilling by air since, in comparison with the other two systems, the producer loses 2,950,899 PLN a year. By contrast, air chilling is the most favourable to the consumer. He gains 0.17 PLN per 1 kg of chicken meat purchased. Considering the yearly consumption of chicken meat, an individual consumer gains 4.50 PLN but the yearly gain from this method of chilling to entire society amounts to 203,910,000 PLN. The application of the other two chilling methods results in considerable losses to the social budget, which are especially high in the case of the immersion method.
机译:该研究的目的是评估采用不同的冷冻家禽屠体方法对家禽生产者和消费者造成的收益和损失。该研究是通过三种不同的系统,即空气冷冻系统,对120只屠宰鸡的尸体进行了研究。 ,浸入式冷却和蒸发式冷却,每个系统40个屠体。最初通过所谓的植物方法确定了冷藏前后屠体的重量损失或增加。在内脏,去除内脏和脂肪之后,但在第一次清洗之前,直接测量重量。每个car体称重至一克的精度。然后,将屠体再次吊在屠宰线上,在那里进行洗涤,冷藏和排水。按照上述步骤,第二次称重尸体。计算以下参数:冷藏后the体的平均增重或减重(g / car体);冷藏后the体的平均增重或减重(g / kg);冷藏CIAO后of体的相对体重增加或减少。接下来,根据对家禽场和家禽消费者的经济收益或损失来评估所检查的冷冻系统。经济分析涉及以下指标:加工过程中工厂的损益(PLN /屠体);冷藏期间工厂每年的损益(PLN);冷藏期间工厂的损益(PLN /千克销售量);冷藏给消费者带来的收益或损失(购买的每公斤PLN);对消费者的年度损益;选择特定的冷藏方法和每年宰杀鸡对社会预算造成的年度损益发现,冷藏后的屠体重量因所采用的冷藏方法而有很大差异。空气冷却系统使the体​​重量平均降低了2.31%。其他两种冷却方法导致the体重量增加,在浸没系统中增加更大:平均增加3.45%。同样,蒸发系统使the体​​重量增加,但幅度小于浸入法:平均为2.63%。浸没式冷冻证明对生产者最有利。这种方法在the体重量上获得最大的收益,主要是增加了肉中的游离水含量。该工厂每1公斤肉获得0.20兹罗提,但每年的收益高达3,449,605兹罗提。蒸发系统也对生产者有利可图,但经济收益要比浸没系统小。从生产者的角度来看,最不希望的是通过空气冷却,因为与其他两个系统相比,生产者每年损失2,950,899 PLN。相比之下,空气冷却对消费者最有利。每购买1千克鸡肉,他可获得0.17 PLN波兰兹罗提。考虑到鸡肉的年消费量,个人消费量为4.50 PLN,但是通过这种冷藏方法对整个社会的年消费量为203,910,000 PLN。其他两种冷却方法的应用会导致社会预算的大量损失,对于浸入式方法尤其如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号