首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Improvement of Short-Term Outcomes for High-Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers With Addition of Argon Plasma Coagulation Following Endoscopic Injection Therapy A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Improvement of Short-Term Outcomes for High-Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers With Addition of Argon Plasma Coagulation Following Endoscopic Injection Therapy A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:内镜下注射治疗后加氩血浆凝集可改善高危出血性消化性溃疡的近期疗效,随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A second endoscopic method together with injection therapy is recommended to treat high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers. This study investigated whether additional argon plasma coagulation (APC) treatment could influence hemostatic efficacy following endoscopic injection therapy to treat high-risk bleeding ulcers.From October 2010 to January 2012, eligible patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers were admitted to our hospital. They prospectively randomly underwent either APC therapy along with distilled water injection or distilled water injection alone. Episodes of rebleeding were retreated with endoscopic combination therapy. Patients in whom retreatment was ineffective underwent emergency surgery or transarterial embolization (TAE).A total of 116 enrolled patients were analyzed. The hemostatic efficacy in 58 patients treated with APC along with distilled water injection was compared with that in 58 patients treated with distilled water injection alone. The 2 treatment groups were similar with respect to all baseline characteristics. Initial hemostasis was accomplished in 56 patients treated with combined therapy, and 55 patients treated with distilled water injection therapy (97% vs 95%, P=0.648). Bleeding recurred in 2 patients treated with combined therapy, and 9 patients treated with distilled water injection (3.6% vs 16%, P=0.029). Treatment method was the only independent prognostic factor for recurrent bleeding (odds ratio 0.17; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.84; P=0.029). The 2 groups did not differ significantly in hospital stay, TAE, surgery, and mortality.Endoscopic therapy with APC following distilled water injection is more effective than distilled water injection alone for preventing rebleeding of peptic ulcer.
机译:建议使用第二种内窥镜检查方法和注射疗法来治疗高危出血性消化性溃疡。本研究调查了内镜注射疗法治疗高危出血性溃疡后,额外的氩气血浆凝固(APC)治疗是否会影响止血效果.2010年10月至2012年1月,符合条件的高危出血性溃疡患者入院。他们前瞻性地随机接受了APC疗法以及蒸馏水注射或单独使用蒸馏水注射。内镜联合治疗可减少再出血发作。再治疗无效的患者接受急诊手术或经动脉栓塞(TAE)。共纳入116例患者。比较58例APC合并蒸馏水注射治疗的止血效果与58例单独使用蒸馏水注射治疗的止血效果。就所有基线特征而言,两个治疗组相似。初次止血在56例联合治疗患者中完成,55例在蒸馏水注射治疗中完成(97%vs 95%,P = 0.648)。 2例联合治疗的患者和9例蒸馏水注射的患者再次出现出血(3.6%vs 16%,P = 0.029)。治疗方法是复发性出血的唯一独立预后因素(几率0.17; 95%置信区间0.03-0.84; P = 0.029)。两组在住院时间,TAE,手术和死亡率方面均无显着差异。注射蒸馏水后内镜下APC的治疗比单独使用蒸馏水预防消化性溃疡再出血更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号