首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The Impact of Confluence Types of the Right Gastroepiploic Vein on No. 6 Lymphadenectomy During Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy
【24h】

The Impact of Confluence Types of the Right Gastroepiploic Vein on No. 6 Lymphadenectomy During Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy

机译:腹腔镜根治性胃切除术中右胃上颌静脉融合类型对第6淋巴结清扫术的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated anatomical variations in the confluence types of the right gastroepiploic vein (RGEV) to improve knowledge regarding no. 6 lymphadenectomy for laparoscopic gastrectomy.The RGEV drainage patterns of 144 patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy at our department from July 2010 to June 2011 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed, and we compared the impact of different drainage patterns on no. 6 lymphadenectomy.The RGEV confluence types were classified into 6 categories in this study. Types I, II, and III, which were observed in 53 (36.8%), 27 (18.8%), and 21 (14.6%) cases, respectively, were the most frequently found during gastrectomy. All 3 of these types included a gastropancreatic trunk and were defined as the gastropancreatic group (GP group). In addition, 15 cases (10.4%) were categorized as type IV, 19 (13.2%) were categorized as type V, and 9 (6.3%) were categorized as type VI. These 3 types, which could form a gastrocolic trunk, were defined as the gastrocolic group (GC group). No significant differences were found with respect to the clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative morbidity, perioperative mortality, and 3-year overall survival rates after surgery between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). However, the mean no. 6 lymph node (No. 6 LN) dissection time, the mean blood loss due to No. 6 LN dissection and the rate of infrapyloric vascular injury were significantly increased in the GC group compared with the GP group (all P<0.05).The RGEV exhibits 6 types of drainage patterns, and the division points of this vein during laparoscopic gastrectomy depend on the different drainage patterns. For types IV, V, and VI, the surgeon should carefully vascularize and divide the RGEV above its confluences during surgery.
机译:这项研究调查了右胃上表静脉(RGEV)汇合类型的解剖变异,以提高有关否的知识。 6进行腹腔镜胃切除术的淋巴结清扫术。前瞻性收集并回顾性分析了我科于2010年7月至2011年6月行胃癌远端腹腔镜切除术的144例胃癌患者的RGEV引流方式,并比较了不同引流方式对胃癌的影响。没有。 6淋巴结清扫术。本研究将RGEV融合类型分为6类。 I型,II型和III型分别在胃切除术中最常见,分别见于53(36.8%),27(18.8%)和21(14.6%)例。这些类型中的所有3种都包括胃胰干,并被定义为胃胰组(GP组)。此外,有15例(10.4%)被归为IV型,19例(13.2%)被归为V型,9例(6.3%)被归为VI型。可以形成胃粘膜躯干的这三种类型被定义为胃粘膜组(GC组)。两组之间在临床病理特征,术后发病率,围手术期死亡率和术后3年总生存率方面均无显着差异(均P> 0.05)。但是,没有。与GP组相比,GC组6号淋巴结清扫时间,6号淋巴结清扫时间,6号淋巴结清扫术引起的平均失血量和幽门下血管损伤的发生率均显着增加(所有P <0.05)。 RGEV表现出6种类型的引流方式,腹腔镜胃切除术中该静脉的分割点取决于不同的引流方式。对于IV型,V型和VI型,外科医生应在手术过程中小心地使RGEV血管化并在其汇合处上方进行分割。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号