首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Sex Differences in the Morphine-Sparing Effects of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine in Patient-Controlled Analgesia Following General Anesthesia A Consort-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
【24h】

Sex Differences in the Morphine-Sparing Effects of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine in Patient-Controlled Analgesia Following General Anesthesia A Consort-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

机译:全身麻醉后患者自控镇痛中术中右美托咪定的吗啡保护作用的性别差异A配偶前瞻性,随机,对照临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous studies have reported that intraoperative dexmedetomidine has morphine-sparing effects in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The present study was designed to investigate the possible sex differences in the morphine-sparing effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine following general anesthesia. A total of 223 patients scheduled for surgeries under general anesthesia were divided into female and male groups. Each group was then subdivided into 2 subgroups that were maintained using propofol/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine (PRD) or propofol/remifentanil/saline (PRS). During the first 24 hours post-surgery, both female and male PRD patients had lower scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) (fPRS vs fPRD, P<0.05 or P<0.01; mPRS mPRD, P<0.05, P<0.01, or P<0.001) and consumed less morphine than their controls from the PRS group (fPRS vs fPRD, P = 0.0392; mPRS vs mPRD, P = 0.0041). Interestingly, the female PRD patients had similar VAS scores (fPRD vs mPRD, P>0.05) and consumed comparable morphine compared to the male PRD patients (fPRD vs mPRD, P = 0.4238). However, when normalized to body weight, they consumed much more morphine than male PRD patients (fPRD vs mPRD, P<0.001), and this effect was not seen in the PRS patients. Intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine appeared to have a stronger morphine-sparing effect in controlling postoperative acute pain in male patients than in female patients.
机译:先前的研究报道,术中右美托咪定在患者自控镇痛(PCA)中具有吗啡保护作用。本研究旨在调查全身麻醉后术中右美托咪定在吗啡保护作用中可能存在的性别差异。计划在全身麻醉下进行手术的223位患者分为女性和男性。然后将每组再分为2个亚组,使用丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼/右美托咪定(PRD)或丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼/盐水(PRS)进行维持。在手术后的前24小时内,女性和男性PRD患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分均较低(fPRS vs fPRD,P <0.05或P <0.01; mPRS mPRD,P <0.05,P <0.01,或P <0.001),并且比PRS组的对照组消耗的吗啡少(fPRS vs fPRD,P = 0.0392; mPRS vs mPRD,P = 0.0041)。有趣的是,女性PRD患者具有相似的VAS评分(fPRD vs mPRD,P> 0.05),并且与男性PRD患者相比消耗了吗啡(fPRD vs mPRD,P = 0.4238)。但是,当按体重标准化后,他们消耗的吗啡比男性PRD患者要多得多(fPRD vs mPRD,P <0.001),并且在PRS患者中未观察到这种作用。术中右美托咪定在控制男性患者术后急性疼痛方面比女性患者具有更强的吗啡保护作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号