...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Usefulness of Glycemic Gap to Predict ICU Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Diabetes
【24h】

Usefulness of Glycemic Gap to Predict ICU Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Diabetes

机译:血糖间隙在重症糖尿病患者中预测ICU死亡率的有用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Stress-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) has been independently associated with an increased risk of mortality in critically ill patients without diabetes. However, it is also necessary to consider preexisting hyperglycemia when investigating the relationship between SIH and mortality in patients with diabetes. We therefore assessed whether the gap between admission glucose and A1C-derived average glucose (ADAG) levels could be a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients with diabetes.We retrospectively reviewed the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scores and clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes admitted to our medical intensive care unit (ICU) between 2011 and 2014. The glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were converted to the ADAG by the equation, ADAG=[(28.7xHbA1c)-46.7]. We also used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the optimal cut-off value for the glycemic gap when predicting ICU mortality and used the net reclassification improvement (NRI) to measure the improvement in prediction performance gained by adding the glycemic gap to the APACHE-II score.We enrolled 518 patients, of which 87 (17.0%) died during their ICU stay. Nonsurvivors had significantly higher APACHE-II scores and glycemic gaps than survivors (P<0.001). Critically ill patients with diabetes and a glycemic gap 80mg/dL had significantly higher ICU mortality and adverse outcomes than those with a glycemic gap <80mg/dL (P<0.001). Incorporation of the glycemic gap into the APACHE-II score increased the discriminative performance for predicting ICU mortality by increasing the area under the ROC curve from 0.755 to 0.794 (NRI=13.6%, P=0.0013).The glycemic gap can be used to assess the severity and prognosis of critically ill patients with diabetes. The addition of the glycemic gap to the APACHE-II score significantly improved its ability to predict ICU mortality.
机译:应激诱发的高血糖症(SIH)与非糖尿病危重患者的死亡风险增加独立相关。但是,在调查SIH与糖尿病患者死亡率之间的关系时,也有必要考虑预先存在的高血糖症。因此,我们评估了入院血糖与A1C衍生的平均血糖(ADAG)水平之间的差距是否可以作为重症糖尿病患者死亡率的预测指标。我们回顾性地回顾了急性生理和慢性健康评估II(APACHE-II)得分和2011年至2014年间接受我们的重症监护病房(ICU)治疗的糖尿病患者的临床结局。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平通过方程ADAG = [(28.7xHbA1c)-46.7]转换为ADAG。我们还使用接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线来确定预测ICU死亡率时血糖间隙的最佳临界值,并使用净重分类改进(NRI)来衡量通过将血糖间隙加到血糖值上而获得的预测性能的改善。 APACHE-II评分。我们招募了518例患者,其中87例(17.0%)在其入住ICU期间死亡。非幸存者的APACHE-II评分和血糖差距明显高于幸存者(P <0.001)。血糖间隙小于等于80mg / dL的重症糖尿病患者的ICU死亡率和不良结局明显高于血糖间隙小于等于80mg / dL的患者(P <0.001)。通过将ROC曲线下的面积从0.755增加到0.794(NRI = 13.6%,P = 0.0013),将血糖缺口纳入APACHE-II评分可提高区分ICU死亡率的能力。重症糖尿病患者的严重程度和预后。在APACHE-II评分中增加血糖缺口可显着提高其预测ICU死亡率的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号