首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >A systematic review and meta-analysis including GRADE qualification of the risk of surgical site infections after prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional dressings in clean and contaminated surgery
【24h】

A systematic review and meta-analysis including GRADE qualification of the risk of surgical site infections after prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional dressings in clean and contaminated surgery

机译:系统评价和荟萃分析,包括采用GRADE资格进行的预防性负压伤口治疗与干净和污染的手术中传统敷料相比手术部位感染风险的鉴定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective:Systematically review and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) studies on prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs).Introduction:pNPWT has been suggested as a new method to prevent wound complications, specifically SSIs, by its application on closed incisional wounds.Methods:This review was conducted as part of the development of the Global Guidelines for prevention of SSIs commissioned by World Health Organization in Geneva. PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and the World Health Organization database between January 1, 1990 and October 7, 2015 were searched. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing pNPWT with conventional wound dressings and reporting on the incidence of SSI. Meta-analyses were performed with a random effect model. GRADE Pro software was used to qualify the evidence.Results:Nineteen articles describing 21 studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 15 observational) were included in the review. Summary estimate showed a significant benefit of pNPWT over conventional wound dressings in reducing SSIs in both randomized controlled trials and observational studies, odds ratio of 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.96; P = 0.04) and odds ratio of 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.42; P<0.00001), respectively. This translates into lowering the SSI rate from 140 to 83 (49-135) per 1000 patients and from 106 to 34 (25-47) per 1000 patients, respectively. In stratified analyses, these results were consistent in both clean and clean-contaminated procedures and in different types of surgery, however results were no longer significant for orthopaedic/trauma surgery. The level of evidence as qualified with GRADE was however low.Conclusions:Low-quality evidence indicates that prophylactic NPWT significantly reduces the risk of SSIs.
机译:目的:对预防性负压伤口疗法(pNPWT)预防手术部位感染(SSI)的建议评估,发展和评估(GRADE)研究进行系统回顾和分级。方法:本次审查是日内瓦世界卫生组织委托制定的《全球预防SSI预防指南》的一部分。搜索1990年1月1日至2015年10月7日之间的PubMed,Embase,CENTRAL,CINAHL和世界卫生组织的数据库。纳入标准为随机对照试验和观察性研究,将pNPWT与常规伤口敷料进行比较,并报告SSI的发生率。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型进行。结果:本评价包括19篇描述21项研究的文章(6项随机对照试验和15项观察性研究)。简要估计表明,在随机对照试验和观察性研究中,pNPWT较常规伤口敷料在降低SSI方面具有显着优势,优势比为0.56(95%置信区间,0.32-0.96; P = 0.04)和优势比为0.30(95%)置信区间为0.22-0.42; P <0.00001)。这意味着SSI率分别从每1000名患者140降到83(49-135),从每1000名患者106降到34(25-47)。在分层分析中,这些结果在干净的和干净污染的程序以及不同类型的手术中都是一致的,但是对于骨科/创伤手术而言,这些结果不再重要。结论:低质量的证据表明,预防性NPWT显着降低了发生SSI的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号