首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Etiologic diagnosis of 204 pericardial effusions.
【24h】

Etiologic diagnosis of 204 pericardial effusions.

机译:204例心包积液的病因诊断。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The etiologic evaluation of pericardial effusion is frequently unsuccessful when noninvasive methods are used. To determine the cause of the current episode, all patients with echographically identified pericardial effusion from May 1998 to December 2002 underwent noninvasive diagnostic testing of blood, throat, and stool samples. Patients with postpericardiotomy syndrome were excluded. To analyze the value of our tests, we tested randomly selected blood donors as negative controls. Among 204 included patients, 107 (52.4%) had a final etiologic diagnosis: the etiology of 52 was highly suspected at first examination and later confirmed (thyroid deficiency, 5 cases; systemic lupus erythematous, 7; rheumatoid arthritis, 7; scleroderma, 3; cancer, 25; and renal insufficiency, 5). A definite etiologic diagnosis was made in 11 patients from pericardial fluid analysis (cancer, 5 cases; tuberculosis, 3; Streptococcus pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii, and Actinomyces, 1 case each). Among 141 patients consideredto have idiopathic pericarditis, 44 (32.1%) gained an etiologic diagnosis by our systematic testing strategy. This included serologic evaluation of serum (Coxiella burnetii, 10 cases; Bartonella quintana, 1; Legionella pneumophila, 1; Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 4; influenza virus, 1), viral culture of throat swabs (enterovirus, 8 cases; and adenovirus, 1), high-level antinuclear antibodies (>1/400, 3 cases), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (15 abnormal results). Antibodies to Toxoplasma and cytomegalovirus, enterovirus recovered from rectal swabs, and low-level antinuclear antibodies were seen with equal frequency in patients and controls.Using our evaluation strategy, the number of pericardial effusions classified as idiopathic was less than in other series. Systematic testing for Q fever, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, thyroid abnormalities, and antinuclear antibodies, accompanied by viral throat cultures, frequently enabled us to diagnose diseases not initially suspected in patients with pericardial effusion.
机译:使用非侵入性方法时,心包积液的病因学评估通常不成功。为了确定当前发作的原因,从1998年5月至2002年12月对所有经超声检查确定为心包积液的患者均进行了血液,喉咙和粪便样本的非侵入性诊断测试。心包切开术后综合征患者被排除在外。为了分析测试的价值,我们测试了随机选择的献血者作为阴性对照。在204名患者中,有107名(52.4%)的病因得到了最终的病因诊断:52名病因在首次检查时被高度怀疑,随后被证实(甲状腺功能低下5例;系统性红斑狼疮7例;类风湿性关节炎7例;硬皮病3例) ;癌症(25)和肾功能不全(5)。通过心包液分析对11例患者进行了明确的病因诊断(癌症5例;结核3例;肺炎链球菌,弗氏柠檬酸杆菌和放线菌1例)。通过我们系统的检测策略,在141名被认为患有特发性心包炎的患者中,有44名(32.1%)获得了病因诊断。这包括血清学血清学评估(伯氏柯氏杆菌10例;金枪鱼巴尔通体1例;肺炎军团菌1例;肺炎支原体4例;流感病毒1例);咽拭子病毒培养(肠病毒8例;腺病毒1例) ,高水平的抗核抗体(> 1 / 400,3例)和促甲状腺激素(15例异常结果)。在患者和对照组中,弓形虫和巨细胞病毒抗体,从直肠拭子中回收的肠病毒和低水平抗核抗体的发生频率相同。使用我们的评估策略,分类为特发性的心包积液的数量要少于其他系列。对Q发热,肺炎支原体,甲状腺异常和抗核抗体的系统测试,以及病毒性喉咙培养,常常使我们能够诊断出最初心包积液患者不怀疑的疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号