首页> 外文期刊>Medical engineering & physics. >Comparative analysis of methods for automatic detection and quantification of microvolt T-wave alternans.
【24h】

Comparative analysis of methods for automatic detection and quantification of microvolt T-wave alternans.

机译:自动检测和定量微伏T波交替分子方法的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Microvolt T-wave alternans (TWA), consisting of every-other-beat changes in ECG T-wave morphology, is an index of susceptibility to malignant ventricular arrhythmias, requiring automatic techniques to be identified. Five of these, namely, fast-Fourier-transform spectral method (FFTSM), complex-demodulation method (CDM), modified-moving-average method (MMAM), Laplacian-likelihood-ratio method (LLRM) and adaptive-match-filter method (AMFM), were applied here to simulated and sample clinical data. The aim was to compare individual methods ability to properly identify stationary and time-varying TWA, avoiding false-positive detections. The MMAM provided false-positive TWA when applied to simulated ECGs affected by amplitude variability, but TWA. Stationary TWA was properly quantified by the MMAM and, occasionally, underestimated by all other methods. The AMFM properly identified time-varying TWA. By contrast, the FFTSM detected not-stationary TWA as stationary, the MMAM introduced a time-delay in the estimated TWA-amplitude signal, while the CDM and LLRM were reliable only in the presence of slow-varying TWA. Altogether, the AMFM accomplished the best compromise between the needs to avoid false-positive TWA and to detect and characterize true-positive TWA. Results of our simulation approach were useful to explain different TWA levels measured by each competing methods applied to sample Holter ECGs from healthy subjects and coronary artery disease patients.
机译:微伏T波交替神经(TWA)由ECG T波形态的每隔一跳变化组成,是对恶性室性心律失常的易感性指标,需要自动技术进行鉴定。其中五种是快速傅里叶变换频谱方法(FFTSM),复解调方法(CDM),修正移动平均方法(MMAM),拉普拉斯似然比方法(LLRM)和自适应匹配滤波器方法(AMFM)在这里应用于模拟和样本临床数据。目的是比较各种方法正确识别平稳和随时间变化的TWA的能力,从而避免假阳性检测。当将MMAM应用于受幅度变化影响的模拟ECG时,它提供了假阳性TWA,但是TWA。 MMAM对固定的TWA进行了适当的量化,有时其他所有方法都低估了固定的TWA。 AMFM正确识别了随时间变化的TWA。相比之下,FFTSM检测到不稳定的TWA处于静止状态,MMAM在估计的TWA振幅信号中引入了时间延迟,而CDM和LLRM仅在存在缓慢变化的TWA时才是可靠的。总之,AMFM在避免假阳性TWA和检测和表征真阳性TWA的需求之间实现了最佳折衷。我们的模拟方法的结果可用于解释适用于健康受试者和冠状动脉疾病患者的动态心电图样本的每种竞争方法测得的不同TWA水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号