...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Aperture superposition dose model versus pencil beam superposition dose model for a finite size Cobalt-60 source for tomotherapy deliveries
【24h】

Aperture superposition dose model versus pencil beam superposition dose model for a finite size Cobalt-60 source for tomotherapy deliveries

机译:用于有限尺寸Cobalt-60放射成像分娩的孔径叠加剂量模型与笔形束叠加剂量模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The finite size pencil beam (FSPB) superposition method is a commonly used dose calculation method in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The FSPB model assumes that dose for a broad intensity modulated beam can be calculated by superposition of dose from small, pencil-like beams. However, this model is limited to point-like radiation sources and is not valid for finite size sources, such as a Cobalt-60 (Co-60) source of 2 cm diameter. In this paper, the authors present results that show the limitation of this model and propose an alternative model, namely the aperture superposition (AS) model, to calculate photon dose for intensity modulated beams arising from finite size radiation sources. Methods: The AS model is based on adding beam apertures rather than pencil beams. Each aperture is defined as a series of adjacently opened leaves of a multileaf collimator with no closed leaves in between them. The apertures are calculated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo program. The accuracy of the AS model was tested for dose calculations of fan beams, as encountered in tomotherapy treatment plans. The results were compared with the FSPB model and GafChromic film measurements. The measurements and simulations were performed for a clinical Theratronics T780C Co-60 unit with MIMiC binary multileaf collimator mounted on it. Results: The comparisons between the AS model and film measurements show agreement better than 1.5% in the high dose regions and 3.7% in the low dose regions. On the contrary, film measurement comparisons to the FSPB model show that the FSPB model underestimates the dose by up to 7% for small field sizes such as 2 × 2 cm 2 and 20% for larger field sizes such as 20 × 2 cm 2. Conclusions: The results presented in this paper indicate that the AS model provides better accuracy than the FSPB model when calculating dose for fan beams from large radiation sources. The implementation of this model to the current treatment planning systems has the scope of advancing Co-60 based IMRT and tomotherapy.
机译:目的:有限尺寸铅笔束(FSPB)叠加方法是强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)中常用的剂量计算方法。 FSPB模型假定可以通过叠加铅笔状小光束的剂量来计算宽强度调制光束的剂量。但是,此模型仅限于点状辐射源,不适用于有限尺寸的源,例如直径为2 cm的Cobalt-60(Co-60)源。在本文中,作者提出的结果表明了该模型的局限性,并提出了另一种模型,即孔径叠加(AS)模型,以计算由有限尺寸的辐射源产生的强度调制光束的光子剂量。方法:AS模型基于增加光束孔径而不是笔形光束。每个孔被定义为多叶准直器的一系列相邻打开的叶片,在它们之间没有闭合的叶片。使用EGSnrc Monte Carlo程序计算孔径。测试了AS模型的准确性,以计算扇形束的剂量,如在放射疗法治疗计划中所遇到的那样。将结果与FSPB模型和GafChromic膜测量结果进行比较。对安装有MIMiC二元多叶准直仪的临床Theratronics T780C Co-60装置进行了测量和模拟。结果:AS模型和胶片测量结果之间的比较表明,高剂量区域的一致性优于1.5%,低剂量区域的一致性优于3.7%。相反,胶片测量与FSPB模型的比较表明,对于2×2 cm 2的小场尺寸,FSPB模型低估了最高7%的剂量,而对于20×2 cm 2的大场尺寸,FSPB模型低估了20%的剂量。结论:本文提出的结果表明,在计算来自大型辐射源的扇形束的剂量时,AS模型比FSPB模型具有更高的准确性。该模型在当前治疗计划系统中的实施具有推进基于Co-60的IMRT和tomotherapy的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号