...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical and Veterinary Entomology >A lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps.
【24h】

A lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps.

机译:基于致死卵子的大规模诱捕计划,用于澳大利亚的登革热控制:I.致死卵子的公众接受度和性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We report on the first field evaluation of the public acceptability and performance of two types of lethal ovitrap (LO) in three separate trials in Cairns, Australia. Health workers were able to set standard lethal ovitraps (SLOs) in 75 and 71% of premise yards in the wet and dry season, respectively, and biodegradable lethal ovitraps (BLOs) in 93% of yards. Public acceptance, measured as retention of traps by residents, was high for both trap types, with <9% of traps missing after 4 weeks. Traps retaining water after 4 weeks were 78 and 34% for the two SLO trials and 58% for the BLOs. The 'failure rate' in the 535 BLOs set in the field for 4 weeks was 47%, of which 19% were lost, 51% had holes from probable insect chewing, 23% were knocked over, 7% had dried by evaporation and 1% were split. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of BLOs set on porous (grass, soil and mulch) versus solid (tiles, concrete, wood and stone) substrates. The SLOs and the BLOs were readily acceptable to ovipositing Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae); the mean number of eggs/trap was 6 and 15, for the dry season and wet season SLO trial, respectively, and 15 for the BLO wet season trial. Indeed, 84-94% of premise yards had egg positive SLOs or BLOs. A high percentage of both wet and dry season SLOs (29 and 70%, respectively) and BLOs (62%) that were dry after 4 weeks were egg positive, indicating the traps had functioned. Lethal strips from SLOs and BLOs that had been exposed for 4 weeks killed 83 and 74%, respectively, of gravid Ae. aegypti in laboratory assays. These results indicate that mass trapping schemes using SLOs and BLOs are not rejected by the public and effectively target gravid Ae. aegypti. The impact of the interventions on mosquito populations is described in a companion paper.
机译:我们在澳大利亚凯恩斯的三项独立试验中报告了对两种类型的致死性产卵器(LO)的公众可接受性和性能的首次现场评估。卫生工作者能够在湿季和旱季分别在75%和71%的院子里设置标准的致死性产卵器(SLO),并在93%的院子中设置可生物降解的致死卵子(BLO)。两种类型的陷阱的公众接受度(以居民对陷阱的保留程度来衡量)都很高,在4周后丢失的陷阱不到9%。两项SLO试验在4周后保水的陷阱分别为78%和34%,而BLO为58%。现场设定的535个BLO在4个星期内的“故障率”为47%,其中19%丢失,51%可能因昆虫咀嚼而破洞,23%被击倒,7%因蒸发而干燥,1 %被分割了。在多孔(草,土壤和覆盖物)上设置的BLO与固体(砖,混凝土,木材和石材)上的BLO的失败率没有显着差异。 SLO和BLO易于产卵埃及伊蚊(Diptera:Culicidae)。在干燥季节和潮湿季节的SLO试验中,平均蛋/捕集器的数量分别为6和15,而在BLO潮湿季节试验中,平均数量为15。实际上,84-94%的院子里有鸡蛋阳性的SLO或BLO。 4周后干燥的湿季和干季SLO(分别为29%和70%)和BLO(62%)的高百分比均为鸡蛋阳性,表明诱捕器已起作用。暴露4周的SLO和BLO的致死性条带分别杀死了83%和74%的妊娠Ae。埃及化验。这些结果表明,使用SLO和BLO的大规模诱捕方案并未受到公众的拒绝,并有效地针对了妊娠Ae。埃及。配套文件中介绍了干预措施对蚊子种群的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号