首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Progress testing: Is there a role for the OSCE?
【24h】

Progress testing: Is there a role for the OSCE?

机译:进度测试:OSCE是否有作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context: The shift from a time-based to a competency-based framework in medical education has created a need for frequent formative assessments. Many educational programmes use some form of written progress test to identify areas of strength and weakness and to promote continuous improvement in their learners. However, the role of performance-based assessments, such as objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs), in progress testing remains unclear. Objective: The aims of this paper are to describe the use of an OSCE to assess learners at different stages of training, describe a structure for reporting scores, and provide evidence for the psychometric properties of different rating tools. Methods: A 10-station OSCE was administered to internal medicine residents in postgraduate years (PGYs) 1-4. Candidates were assessed using a checklist (CL), a global rating scale (GRS) and a training level rating scale (TLRS). Reliability was calculated for each measure using Cronbach's alpha. Differences in performance by year of training were explored using analysis of variance (anova). Correlations between scores obtained using the different rating instruments were calculated. Results: Sixty-nine residents participated in the OSCE. Inter-station reliability was greater (0.88) using the TLRS compared with the CL (0.84) and GRS (0.79). Using all three rating instruments, scores varied significantly by year of training (p < 0.001). Scores from the different rating instruments were highly correlated: CL and GRS, r = 0.93; CL and TLRS, r = 0.90, and GRS and TLRS, r = 0.94 (p < 0.001). Candidates received feedback on their performance relative to examiner expectations for their PGY level. Conclusions: Scores were found to have high reliability and demonstrated significant differences in performance by year of training. This provides evidence for the validity of using scores achieved on an OSCE as markers of progress in learners at different levels of training. Future studies will focus on assessing individual progress on the OSCE over time.
机译:背景:医学教育从基于时间的框架向基于能力的框架的转变产生了对频繁形成性评估的需求。许多教育计划都使用某种形式的书面进度测试来确定优点和缺点,并促进他们的学习者不断进步。但是,基于性能的评估(例如客观结构化临床检查(OSCE))在进度测试中的作用仍不清楚。目的:本文的目的是描述使用OSCE评估培训的不同阶段的学习者,描述报告分数的结构,并为不同评估工具的心理计量学特性提供证据。方法:在研究生年份(PGYs)1-4对内科住院医师进行10站OSCE。使用清单(CL),总体评分量表(GRS)和培训水平评分量表(TLRS)对候选人进行评估。使用克伦巴赫(Cronbach's)α计算每种量度的可靠性。使用方差分析(方差分析)探索了培训年度的表现差异。计算使用不同评级工具获得的得分之间的相关性。结果:六十九名居民参加了欧安组织。与CL(0.84)和GRS(0.79)相比,使用TLRS的站间可靠性更高(0.88)。使用所有这三种评估工具,分数随培训年份的不同而有显着差异(p <0.001)。不同评级工具的得分高度相关:CL和GRS,r = 0.93; CL和TLRS,r = 0.90,GRS和TLRS,r = 0.94(p <0.001)。考生收到了与考官对PGY水平的期望有关的绩效反馈。结论:分数被认为具有很高的可靠性,并且在训练的年份中表现出显着的差异。这提供了使用OSCE上获得的分数作为学习者在不同级别培训中进步的标志的有效性的证据。未来的研究将集中于评估一段时间内欧安组织的个人进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号