首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Divergence in student and educator conceptual structures during auscultation training
【24h】

Divergence in student and educator conceptual structures during auscultation training

机译:听诊培训期间学生和教育者概念结构的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context Simulation-based medical education allows trainees to engage in self-regulated learning (SRL), yet research aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of SRL in this context is relatively absent. We compared 'unguided' SRL with 'directed' SRL (DSRL), wherein learners followed an expert-designed booklet. Methods Year1 medical students (n=37) were randomly assigned to practise identifying seven cardiac murmurs using a simulator and video only (SRL group) or a simulator and video plus the booklet (DSRL group). All participants completed a 22-item test 3weeks later. To compare interventions, we analysed students' diagnostic accuracy. As a novel source of evidence, we documented how participants autonomously sequenced the seven murmurs during initial and delayed practice sessions. In addition, we surveyed clinical educators (n=17) to find out how they would sequence their teaching of these murmurs. Results The DSRL group used 50% more training time than the SRL group (p<0.001). The groups' diagnostic accuracy, however, did not differ significantly on the post-test, retention test or transfer test items (p>0.12). Despite practising with the expert-defined 'timing-based' approach to murmur diagnosis (i.e. systolic versus diastolic), 84% of DSRL participants implemented a location-based approach (i.e. practising aortic murmurs separately from mitral murmurs) during a second, unguided practice session. Notably, most SRL participants used that same approach spontaneously. By contrast, clinical educators were split in their use of the timing-based (n=10) and the location-based (n=6) approaches. Chi-squared analyses suggested educators' conceptions for organising murmurs differed significantly from students' conceptions. Conclusions Contrary to our predictions, directing students' SRL produced no additional benefit and increased their practice time. Our findings suggest one potential source of these results was a divergence between student and educator conceptions for structuring the practice of cardiac auscultation skills. This phenomenon has not been well articulated in the medical education literature, and may have important implications in many (especially technology-mediated) educational contexts. Discuss ideas arising from this article at 'discuss'
机译:基于情境模拟的医学教育允许受训人员进行自我调节学习(SRL),但是相对缺乏在这种情况下旨在阐明SRL机理的研究。我们将“无指导” SRL与“有指导” SRL(DSRL)进行了比较,其中学习者遵循专家设计的手册。方法随机分配1年级医学生(n = 37),使用模拟和仅视频(SRL组)或模拟和视频加手册(DSRL组)练习识别7种心脏杂音。 3周后,所有参与者都完成了22个项目的测试。为了比较干预措施,我们分析了学生的诊断准确性。作为新颖的证据来源,我们记录了参与者在初始和延迟练习期间如何自动对七个杂音进行排序。此外,我们对临床教育工作者(n = 17)进行了调查,以了解他们如何对这些杂音进行教学。结果DSRL组比SRL组花费了50%的训练时间(p <0.001)。但是,各组的诊断准确性在后测,保留测试或转移测试项目上没有显着差异(p> 0.12)。尽管采用专家定义的“基于时间的”杂音诊断方法(即收缩压与舒张压),但84%的DSRL参与者在第二次非指导性操作中仍采用了基于位置的方法(即与二尖瓣杂音分开进行主动脉杂音)会议。值得注意的是,大多数SRL参与者自发地使用了相同的方法。相比之下,临床教育工作者在基于时间的方法(n = 10)和基于位置的方法(n = 6)的使用上存在分歧。卡方分析表明,教育者组织杂音的观念与学生的观念明显不同。结论与我们的预测相反,指导学生的SRL没有产生任何额外的好处,并且增加了他们的练习时间。我们的发现表明,这些结果的潜在来源之一是学生和教育者在构筑心脏听诊技能实践方面的观念差异。这种现象在医学教育文献中尚未得到很好的阐述,并且可能在许多(尤其是技术介导的)教育环境中具有重要意义。在“讨论”中讨论本文提出的想法

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号