...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Superior liver sparing by combined coplanaroncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A planning and feasibility study
【24h】

Superior liver sparing by combined coplanaroncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A planning and feasibility study

机译:共平面/非平面平面容积调制弧光疗法联合治疗肝细胞癌的优良肝保活:一项计划和可行性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Compared with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT) and tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows additional arc configurations in treatment planning and noncoplanar (NC) delivery. This study was first to compare VMAT planning with sIMRT planning, and the second to evaluate the toxicity of coplanar (C)/NC-VMAT treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fifteen patients with HCC (7 with left-lobe and 8 with right-lobe tumors) were planned with C-VMAT, C/NC-VMAT, and sIMRT. The median total dose was 49Gy (range: 40 to 56Gy), whereas the median fractional dose was 3.5Gy (range: 3 to 8Gy). Different doses/fractionations were converted to normalized doses of 2Gy per fraction using an α/β ratio of 2.5. The mean liver dose, volume fraction receiving more than 10Gy (V10), 20Gy (V20), 30Gy (V30), effective volume (Veff), and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) were compared. C/NC-VMAT in 6 patients was evaluated for delivery accuracy and treatment-related toxicity. Compared with sIMRT, both C-VMAT (p = 0.001) and C/NC-VMAT (p = 0.03) had significantly improved target conformity index. Compared with C-VMAT and sIMRT, C/NC-VMAT for treating left-lobe tumors provided significantly better liver sparing as evidenced by differences in mean liver dose (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007), V10 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009), V20 (p = 0.006 and p = 0.01), V30 (p = 0.02 and p = 0.002), Veff (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001), and EUD (p = 0.04 and p = 0.003), respectively. For right-lobe tumors, there was no difference in liver sparing between C/NC-VMAT, C-VMAT, and sIMRT. In all patients, dose to more than 95% of target points met the 3%/3mm criteria. All 6 patients tolerated C/NC-VMAT and none of them had treatment-related ≥ grade 2 toxicity. The C/NC-VMAT can be used clinically for HCC and provides significantly better liver sparing in patients with left-lobe tumors.
机译:与步调强度调制放射疗法(sIMRT)和断层疗法相比,体积调制弧光疗法(VMAT)在治疗计划和非共面(NC)交付中可提供其他弧光配置。这项研究首先是将VMAT计划与sIMRT计划进行比较,其次是评估共面(C)/ NC-VMAT治疗对肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的毒性。计划用C-VMAT,C / NC-VMAT和sIMRT计划治疗15例HCC患者(7例为左叶肿瘤,而8例为右叶肿瘤)。中位总剂量为49Gy(范围:40至56Gy),而中位分次剂量为3.5Gy(范围:3至8Gy)。使用2.5的α/β比,将不同剂量/馏分转换为每馏分2Gy的标准化剂量。比较平均肝脏剂量,接受大于10Gy(V10),20Gy(V20),30Gy(V30),有效体积(Veff)和等效均等剂量(EUD)的体积分数。评价了6例患者的C / NC-VMAT的分娩准确性和与治疗相关的毒性。与sIMRT相比,C-VMAT(p = 0.001)和C / NC-VMAT(p = 0.03)均显着改善了目标合格指数。与C-VMAT和sIMRT相比,C / NC-VMAT治疗左叶肿瘤提供了更好的肝脏保留,这由平均肝剂量(p = 0.03和p = 0.007),V10(p = 0.003和p = 0.009),V20(p = 0.006和p = 0.01),V30(p = 0.02和p = 0.002),Veff(p = 0.006和p = 0.001)和EUD(p = 0.04和p = 0.003)。对于右叶肿瘤,C / NC-VMAT,C-VMAT和sIMRT在肝脏保留方面无差异。在所有患者中,达到95%以上目标点的剂量均达到3%/ 3mm的标准。所有6例患者均耐受C / NC-VMAT,且均无治疗相关的≥2级毒性。 C / NC-VMAT可在临床上用于HCC,并为患有左叶肿瘤的患者提供明显更好的肝脏保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号