首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >'My Story': a new departure for Medical Education
【24h】

'My Story': a new departure for Medical Education

机译:“我的故事”:医学教育的新起点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Humans are story-telling animals. For most people, narratives are compelling evidence. It has even been argued that logical thought processes, as observed in science, are unnatural.1 Many recent accounts describe the role of narrative in medicine, and the importance of stories may well be among the most significant ways in which medicine differs from science.To recognise that this is the case is not necessarily to commend or to condemn it. It may be that if humans acted logically, there would be positive outcomes, or that we should cease from striving to promote logical rather than illogical thinking, while recognising the social context in which we operate. Studies on the introduction of evidence-based medicine have shown how difficult it is to convert traditional practices into rational ones. Much evidence on clinical reasoning indicates that it occurs primarily through case or pattern recognition, rather than through logical deductive processes. It may be that clinical reasoning would be more accurate and effective (and possibly error rates might be lower) if we operated in a logical manner, but we have to recognise that it's not going to happen any time soon.
机译:人类是讲故事的动物。对于大多数人来说,叙述是令人信服的证据。甚至有人认为,科学中观察到的逻辑思维过程是不自然的。1最近的许多叙述都描述了叙事在医学中的作用,而故事的重要性很可能是医学不同于科学的最重要方式之一。认识到情况确实如此,并不一定值得赞扬或谴责。可能的是,如果人类采取逻辑行动,将会产生积极的结果,或者我们应该在认识到我们所处的社会环境的同时停止努力促进逻辑思维而不是非逻辑思维。关于引入循证医学的研究表明,将传统实践转化为理性实践是多么困难。关于临床推理的许多证据表明,它主要是通过案例或模式识别而不是通过逻辑演绎过程发生的。如果我们以合理的方式进行操作,则可能是临床推理会更加准确和有效(并且错误率可能会更低),但是我们必须认识到这种情况不会很快发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号