首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Setting school-level outcome standards.
【24h】

Setting school-level outcome standards.

机译:制定学校一级的成果标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background To establish international standards for medical schools, an appropriate panel of experts must decide on performance standards. A pilot test of such standards was set in the context of a multidimensional (multiple-choice question examination, objective structured clinical examination, faculty observation) examination at 8 leading schools in China. Methods A group of 16 medical education leaders from a broad array of countries met over a 3-day period. These individuals considered competency domains, examination items, and the percentage of students who could fall below a cut-off score if the school was still to be considered as meeting competencies. This 2-step process started with a discussion of the borderline school and the relative difficulty of a borderline school in achieving acceptable standards in a given competency domain. Committee members then estimated the percentage of students falling below the standard that is tolerable at a borderline school and were allowed to revise their ratings after viewing pilot data. Results Tolerable failure rates ranged from 10% to 26% across competency domains and examination types. As with other standard-setting exercises, standard deviations from initial to final estimates of the tolerable failure rates fell, but the cut-off scores did not change significantly. Final, but not initial cut-off scores were correlated with student failure rates (r = 0.59, P = 0.03). Discussion This paper describes a method to set school-level outcome standards at an international level based on prior established standard-setting methods. Further refinement of this process and validation using other examinations in other countries will be needed to achieve accurate international standards.
机译:背景技术为了建立医学院校的国际标准,必须由适当的专家小组来决定绩效标准。在中国8所领先学校的多维(多项选择题考试,客观结构化临床考试,教师观察)考试的背景下,对此类标准进行了试点测试。方法来自16个国家的16名医学教育领导者参加了为期3天的会议。这些人考虑了胜任能力领域,考试项目以及如果学校仍被视为具有胜任能力的学生,其分数可能会低于最低分数。这个两步过程从对边界学校的讨论以及边界学校在给定能力领域中达到可接受标准的相对难度开始。然后,委员会成员估算出低于边界学校所能接受的标准的学生百分比,并允许他们在查看试点数据后修改其评分。结果在各个能力领域和考试类型中,可容忍的失效率从10%到26%不等。与其他标准制定活动一样,可容忍失败率的初始估计值到最终估计值的标准差有所下降,但临界值没有明显变化。最终而非初始截止分数与学生失败率相关(r = 0.59,P = 0.03)。讨论本文描述了一种基于先前建立的标准制定方法在国际水平上设定学校水平成果标准的方法。为了达到准确的国际标准,将需要进一步完善该过程并使用其他国家的其他考试进行验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号