首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the clinical learning environment.
【24h】

Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the clinical learning environment.

机译:测量临床学习环境的仪器的心理测量特性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The clinical learning environment is an influential factor in work-based learning. Evaluation of this environment gives insight into the educational functioning of clinical departments. The Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) is an evaluation tool consisting of a validated questionnaire with 3 subscales. In this paper we further investigate the psychometric properties of the PHEEM. We set out to validate the 3 subscales and test the reliability of the PHEEM for both clerks (clinical medical students) and registrars (specialists in training). METHODS: Clerks and registrars from different hospitals and specialties filled out the PHEEM. To investigate the construct validity of the 3 subscales, we used an exploratory factor analysis followed by varimax rotation, and a cluster analysis known as Mokken scale analysis. We estimated the reliability of the questionnaire by means of variance components according to generalisability theory. RESULTS: A total of 256 clerks and 339 registrars filled out the questionnaire. The exploratory factor analysis plus varimax rotation suggested a 1-dimensional scale. The Mokken scale analysis confirmed this result. The reliability analysis showed a reliable outcome for 1 department with 14 clerks or 11 registrars. For multiple departments 3 respondents combined with 10 departments provide a reliable outcome for both groups. DISCUSSION: The PHEEM is a questionnaire measuring 1 dimension instead of the hypothesised 3 dimensions. The sample size required to achieve a reliable outcome is feasible. The instrument can be used to evaluate both single and multiple departments for both clerks and registrars.
机译:目的:临床学习环境是基于工作的学习的影响因素。对这种环境的评估可以深入了解临床部门的教育功能。研究生医院教育环境措施(PHEEM)是一种评估工具,由经过验证的问卷和3个分量表组成。在本文中,我们进一步研究了PHEEM的心理测量特性。我们着手验证这三个分量表,并针对书记员(临床医学生)和注册服务商(培训专家)测试PHEEM的可靠性。方法:来自不同医院和专科的职员和注册员填写了PHEEM。为了调查这三个量表的结构效度,我们使用了探索性因素分析,之后方差最大旋转,并使用了称为Mokken量表分析的聚类分析。我们根据概化理论通过方差成分估计了问卷的可靠性。结果:总共256名书记员和339名注册服务商填写了调查表。探索性因素分析加上varimax旋转建议一维尺度。 Mokken规模分析证实了这一结果。可靠性分析显示,对于一个拥有14个文员或11个注册服务商的部门来说,结果是可靠的。对于多个部门,3个受访者与10个部门相结合,为两组提供了可靠的结果。讨论:PHEEM是一种测量1维而不是假设的3维的问卷。实现可靠结果所需的样本量是可行的。该工具可用于评估单个和多个部门的文员和注册服务商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号