首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Relationship between Physicians' Uncertainty about Clinical Assessments and Patient-Centered Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly
【24h】

Relationship between Physicians' Uncertainty about Clinical Assessments and Patient-Centered Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly

机译:医师对临床评估的不确定性与以患者为中心的老年人结直肠癌筛查建议之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. The goal of this study was to examine associations between physicians' clinical assessments, their certainty in these assessments, and the likelihood of a patient-centered recommendation about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly. Methods. Two hundred seventy-six primary care physicians in the United States read 3 vignettes about an 80-year-old female patient and answered questions about her life expectancy, their confidence in their life expectancy estimate, the balance of benefits/downsides of CRC screening, their certainty in their benefit/downside assessment, and the best course of action regarding CRC screening. We used logistic regression to determine the relationship between these variables and patient-centered recommendations about CRC screening. Results. In bivariate analyses, physicians had higher odds of making a patient-centered recommendation about CRC screening when their clinical assessments did not lead to a clear screening recommendation or when they experienced uncertainty in their clinical assessments. However, in a multivariate regression model, only benefit/downside assessment and best course of action remained statistically significant predictors of a patient-centered recommendation. Conclusions. Our findings demonstrate that when the results of clinical assessments do not lead to obvious screening decisions or when physicians feel uncertain about their clinical assessments, they are more likely to make patient-centered recommendations. Existing uncertainty frameworks do not adequately describe the uncertainty associated with patient-centered recommendations found in this study. Adapting or modifying these frameworks to better reflect the constructs associated with uncertainty and the interactions between uncertainty and the complexity inherent in clinical decisions will facilitate a more complete understanding of how and when physicians choose to include patients in clinical decisions.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是检查医师临床评估之间的关联,他们在评估中的确定性以及以患者为中心的老年人结直肠癌(CRC)筛查推荐的可能性。方法。美国的276名初级保健医生阅读了关于一名80岁女病人的三幅短篇小说,并回答了有关她的预期寿命,对预期寿命的信心,CRC筛查的益处/缺点的平衡,他们在收益/缺点评估中的确定性,以及有关CRC筛查的最佳行动方案。我们使用逻辑回归来确定这些变量与以患者为中心的有关CRC筛查的建议之间的关系。结果。在双变量分析中,当临床评估未得出明确的筛查建议或临床评估存在不确定性时,医生对CRC筛查提出以患者为中心的建议的可能性更高。但是,在多元回归模型中,只有收益/缺点评估和最佳行动方案仍然是以患者为中心的推荐的统计学显着预测指标。结论我们的发现表明,当临床评估的结果不能导致明显的筛查决策时,或者当医生对临床评估不确定时,他们更有可能提出以患者为中心的建议。现有的不确定性框架无法充分描述与本研究中以患者为中心的建议相关的不确定性。调整或修改这些框架以更好地反映与不确定性相关的结构,以及不确定性与临床决策固有的复杂性之间的相互作用,将有助于更全面地了解医生如何以及何时选择将患者纳入临床决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号