...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Midline dose verification with diode in vivo dosimetry for external photon therapy of head and neck and pelvis cancers during initial large-field treatments.
【24h】

Midline dose verification with diode in vivo dosimetry for external photon therapy of head and neck and pelvis cancers during initial large-field treatments.

机译:在最初的大视野治疗期间,采用二极管体内剂量学对中线剂量进行验证,以用于头颈部和骨盆癌的外部光子治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

During radiotherapy treatments, quality assurance/control is essential, particularly dose delivery to patients. This study was designed to verify midline doses with diode in vivo dosimetry. Dosimetry was studied for 6-MV bilateral fields in head and neck cancer treatments and 10-MV bilateral and anteroposterior/posteroanterior (AP/PA) fields in pelvic cancer treatments. Calibrations with corrections of diodes were performed using plastic water phantoms; 190 and 100 portals were studied for head and neck and pelvis treatments, respectively. Calculations of midline doses were made using the midline transmission, arithmetic mean, and geometric mean algorithms. These midline doses were compared with the treatment planning system target doses for lateral or AP (PA) portals and paired opposed portals. For head and neck treatments, all 3 algorithms were satisfactory, although the geometric mean algorithm was less accurate and more uncertain. For pelvis treatments, the arithmetic mean algorithm seemed unacceptable, whereas the other algorithms were satisfactory. The random error was reduced by using averaged midline doses of paired opposed portals because the asymmetric effect was averaged out. Considering the simplicity of in vivo dosimetry, the arithmetic mean and geometric mean algorithm should be adopted for headeck and pelvis treatments, respectively.
机译:在放射治疗期间,质量保证/控制至关重要,尤其是向患者的剂量输送。本研究旨在通过二极管体内剂量测定法验证中线剂量。研究了头颈癌治疗中6-MV双边区域和盆腔癌治疗中10-MV双边和前后/后前(AP / PA)区域的剂量测定法。使用塑料水体模进行二极管校正的校准。分别研究了190个和100个门户进行头颈部和骨盆治疗。使用中线透射率,算术平均值和几何平均值算法进行中线剂量的计算。将这些中线剂量与外侧或AP(PA)门和成对的相对门的治疗计划系统目标剂量进行比较。对于头部和颈部治疗,尽管几何均值算法准确性较低且不确定性更高,但所有3种算法均令人满意。对于骨盆治疗,算术平均算法似乎是不可接受的,而其他算法是令人满意的。通过使用成对的相对门户的平均中线剂量,可以减少随机误差,因为不对称效应被平均了。考虑到体内剂量测定的简便性,头/颈部和骨盆治疗应分别采用算术平均值和几何平均值算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号